* [PATCH] kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UML
@ 2022-05-13 18:37 Daniel Latypov
2022-05-16 21:22 ` Brendan Higgins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Latypov @ 2022-05-13 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brendanhiggins, davidgow
Cc: linux-kernel, kunit-dev, linux-kselftest, skhan, Daniel Latypov
The existing logic happens to work fine on UML, but is not correct when
running on other arches.
1. We didn't initialize `int err`, and kunit_filter_suites() doesn't
explicitly set it to 0 on success. So we had false "failures".
Note: it doesn't happen on UML, causing this to get overlooked.
2. If we error out, we do not call kunit_handle_shutdown().
This makes kunit.py timeout when using a non-UML arch, since the QEMU
process doesn't ever exit.
Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
lib/kunit/executor.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index 2f73a6a35a7e..96f96e42ce06 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -247,13 +247,13 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
.start = __kunit_suites_start,
.end = __kunit_suites_end,
};
- int err;
+ int err = 0;
if (filter_glob_param) {
suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param, &err);
if (err) {
pr_err("kunit executor: error filtering suites: %d\n", err);
- return err;
+ goto out;
}
}
@@ -268,9 +268,10 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
}
- kunit_handle_shutdown();
- return 0;
+out:
+ kunit_handle_shutdown();
+ return err;
}
#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST)
base-commit: 9660209d9418f2295d31fea0d32e313e9b2c1200
--
2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UML
2022-05-13 18:37 [PATCH] kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UML Daniel Latypov
@ 2022-05-16 21:22 ` Brendan Higgins
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Higgins @ 2022-05-16 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Latypov; +Cc: davidgow, linux-kernel, kunit-dev, linux-kselftest, skhan
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:37 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
>
> The existing logic happens to work fine on UML, but is not correct when
> running on other arches.
>
> 1. We didn't initialize `int err`, and kunit_filter_suites() doesn't
> explicitly set it to 0 on success. So we had false "failures".
> Note: it doesn't happen on UML, causing this to get overlooked.
> 2. If we error out, we do not call kunit_handle_shutdown().
> This makes kunit.py timeout when using a non-UML arch, since the QEMU
> process doesn't ever exit.
>
> Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-16 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-13 18:37 [PATCH] kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UML Daniel Latypov
2022-05-16 21:22 ` Brendan Higgins
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®