From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: Add an option to enable -O1 and speed-up compilation time
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 20:34:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220523123436.b5gwj55xacc2hxcv@mail.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASHGyzKS-d+S1GYz_L0pBxxSwk05YfvV+LK4ghZ5xx=cA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 12:38:17AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> (+CC: Arnd, Changbin Du)
>
>
> If -O1 support does not require additional effort,
> I have no objection to this patch.
>
> (but I do not have enough insight about
> the compiler's inlining heuristic)
>
>
>
> BTW, when we attempted to add the -Og support,
> we fixed various parts, and Linus rejected it.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/CAK7LNARQggM3aKEPRKJqa4tunFAfmfErMZuS-rrnRv6UB1VpPQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I am afraid that '-O1' has the same situation with '-Og'. As described in GCC
mannual:
Like -O0, -Og completely disables a number of optimization passes so that
individual options controlling them have no effect. Otherwise -Og enables all
-O1 optimization flags except for those that may interfere with debugging:
-fbranch-count-reg -fdelayed-branch
-fdse -fif-conversion -fif-conversion2
-finline-functions-called-once
-fmove-loop-invariants -fmove-loop-stores -fssa-phiopt
-ftree-bit-ccp -ftree-dse -ftree-pta -ftree-sra
> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 6:04 PM Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> >
> > Add a new compilation option which speeds-up compilation time.
> > This can be useful when using static checker such as smatch or build-bots.
> > In such cases, the speed and quality of the generated code is not
> > important.
> >
> > Using -O0 would be even better, but unfortunately, building fails with
> > this option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> > ---
> > Makefile | 5 ++++-
> > init/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index 1f8bef92868f..14467386f947 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -817,7 +817,10 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, format-truncation)
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, format-overflow)
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, address-of-packed-member)
> >
> > -ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE
> > +ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_COMPILATION_SPEED
> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O1
> > +KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS_OPT_LEVEL_MAP := 1
> > +else ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2
> > KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS_OPT_LEVEL_MAP := 2
> > else ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE_O3
> > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > index a96776a9b080..3177a1830c9a 100644
> > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > @@ -1384,6 +1384,14 @@ choice
> > prompt "Compiler optimization level"
> > default CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE
> >
> > +config CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_COMPILATION_SPEED
> > + bool "Optimize for compilation speed (-O1)"
> > + help
> > + This option can be useful when running a static checker such as smatch
> > + or a build-bot.
> > + Compilation time is slighly faster than -O2 and it requires less
> > + memory.
> > +
> > config CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE
> > bool "Optimize for performance (-O2)"
> > help
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
--
Cheers,
Changbin Du
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-21 9:04 Christophe JAILLET
2022-05-21 15:38 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-05-23 12:34 ` Changbin Du [this message]
2022-05-23 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-23 18:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-05-23 20:16 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-05-23 20:31 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-05-24 14:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-05-23 20:25 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-05-23 20:44 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-05-24 14:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220523123436.b5gwj55xacc2hxcv@mail.google.com \
--to=changbin.du@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®