mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* drivers/platform/x86/socwatch/sw_trace_notifier_provider.c:1405:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sw_handle_wakelock_i' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2022-07-26 11:42 kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-07-26 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manisha Chinthapally; +Cc: kbuild-all, linux-kernel, Faycal Benmlih

Hi Manisha,

First bad commit (maybe != root cause):

tree:   https://github.com/mchinth/linux sep_socwatch_linux_5_10
head:   c55df4a2b60fc7c6c4d00fd9f9fb447087833513
commit: 4a8adda8065c4c6944ffedd3025605c845c262a5 SEP/SOCWATCH resolve build errors after rebasing to linux v5.6-rc3
date:   1 year, 10 months ago
config: x86_64-randconfig-s021 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220726/202207261924.uOL8Ab8K-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty
        # https://github.com/mchinth/linux/commit/4a8adda8065c4c6944ffedd3025605c845c262a5
        git remote add mchinth https://github.com/mchinth/linux
        git fetch --no-tags mchinth sep_socwatch_linux_5_10
        git checkout 4a8adda8065c4c6944ffedd3025605c845c262a5
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/platform/x86/socwatch/sw_trace_notifier_provider.c:1405:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sw_handle_wakelock_i' was not declared. Should it be static?
   drivers/platform/x86/socwatch/sw_trace_notifier_provider.c:1634:67: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@     expected unsigned int flags @@     got restricted gfp_t @@
   drivers/platform/x86/socwatch/sw_trace_notifier_provider.c:1634:67: sparse:     expected unsigned int flags
   drivers/platform/x86/socwatch/sw_trace_notifier_provider.c:1634:67: sparse:     got restricted gfp_t

vim +/sw_handle_wakelock_i +1405 drivers/platform/x86/socwatch/sw_trace_notifier_provider.c

d605aabab41663c Jon Moeller 2018-11-13 @1405  void sw_handle_wakelock_i(int cpu, struct sw_trace_notifier_data *node,

:::::: The code at line 1405 was first introduced by commit
:::::: d605aabab41663c9be9e8c549042933189adbf2f platform/x86: add sep and socwatch drivers without socperf.

:::::: TO: Jon Moeller <jon.moeller@intel.com>
:::::: CC: Faycal Benmlih <faycal.benmlih@intel.com>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-07-26 11:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-26 11:42 drivers/platform/x86/socwatch/sw_trace_notifier_provider.c:1405:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sw_handle_wakelock_i' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel test robot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®