mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 09:34:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220822163411.GF6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817014253.1982-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:42:52AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> 'rcu_state.nocb_is_setup' is initialized to true only if 'rcu_nocb_mask'
> successfully allocates memory. So it can be replaced by
> 'cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)'. More importantly, the latter is more
> intuitive, and it has been used in several places.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

One of the implementations of cpumask_available() does indeed check
for NULL.  But here is the other one:

static inline bool cpumask_available(cpumask_var_t mask)
{
	return true;
}

So I have to ask...  In a kernel built with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n,
will this change really work?

Another important question is "Do all of the existing uses of
cpumask_available() really work?"  Yes, I do believe that they do
work, but it would be good to get another set of eyes on that code.
"All software developers are blind!"  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h      | 1 -
>  kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 8 +++-----
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index d4a97e40ea9c3e2..06f659c63d2d192 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -375,7 +375,6 @@ struct rcu_state {
>  	arch_spinlock_t ofl_lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
>  						/* Synchronize offline with */
>  						/*  GP pre-initialization. */
> -	int nocb_is_setup;			/* nocb is setup from boot */
>  };
>  
>  /* Values for rcu_state structure's gp_flags field. */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 0a5f0ef41484518..ff763e7dc53551f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static int __init rcu_nocb_setup(char *str)
>  			cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
>  		}
>  	}
> -	rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  __setup("rcu_nocbs", rcu_nocb_setup);
> @@ -1215,7 +1214,7 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
>  	struct rcu_data *rdp;
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
> -	if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
> +	if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
>  		need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
>  		offload_all = true;
>  	}
> @@ -1235,10 +1234,9 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
>  				return;
>  			}
>  		}
> -		rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
> +	if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
>  		return;
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> @@ -1299,7 +1297,7 @@ static void rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(int cpu)
>  	struct task_struct *t;
>  	struct sched_param sp;
>  
> -	if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || !rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
> +	if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || !cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* If there already is an rcuo kthread, then nothing to do. */
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-22 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-17  1:42 [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu/nocb: Delete local variable 'need_rcu_nocb_mask' in rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-17  1:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup Zhen Lei
2022-08-22 16:34   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-08-23 12:00     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-17  1:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-22 16:35   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-23 12:13     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-25 16:19       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220822163411.GF6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®