From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz()
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 09:35:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220822163512.GG6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817014253.1982-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:42:53AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> When CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional
> CPUs need to be added to 'rcu_nocb_mask'. But 'rcu_nocb_mask' may be not
> available now, due to 'rcu_nocbs' is not specified. Check and initialize
> 'rcu_nocb_mask' before using it. This code simplification strictly follows
> this logic, compared with old implementations, unnecessary crossovers are
> avoided and easy to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
This looks like a nice simplification, but I will wait for your response
on Patch 1/1 before trying it out.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index ff763e7dc53551f..3c59b12f4465af1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -1209,44 +1209,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
> void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> - bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
> - bool offload_all = false;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
> - if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> - offload_all = true;
> - }
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> - offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
> - }
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> + cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> + if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> + cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
> +#endif
>
> - if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> + if (cpumask) {
> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
> return;
> }
> }
> +
> + cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
> }
>
> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask))
> return;
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running)
> - cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> -
> - if (offload_all)
> - cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
> -
> if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
> pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
> cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-17 1:42 [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu/nocb: Delete local variable 'need_rcu_nocb_mask' in rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu: Eliminate rcu_state.nocb_is_setup Zhen Lei
2022-08-22 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-23 12:00 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-22 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-08-23 12:13 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-25 16:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220822163512.GG6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®