mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Conor.Dooley@microchip.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	Guohanjun <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: uaccess: rename __get/put_user_nocheck to __get/put_mem_nocheck
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:56:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825105600.ezueddmwehob42rf@kamzik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815032025.2685516-2-tongtiangen@huawei.com>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 03:20:24AM +0000, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> Current, The helpers __get/put_user_nocheck() is used by get/put_user() and
> __get/put_kernel_nofault(), which is not always uaccess, so the name with
> *user* is not appropriate.
> 
> Also rename xxx_user_xxx to xxx_mem_xx  on the call path of
> __get/put_user_nocheck()
> 
> Only refactor code without any functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 855450bed9f5..1370da055b44 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>   * call.
>   */
>  
> -#define __get_user_asm(insn, x, ptr, err)			\
> +#define __get_mem_asm(insn, x, ptr, err)			\
>  do {								\
>  	__typeof__(x) __x;					\
>  	__asm__ __volatile__ (					\
> @@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ do {								\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> -#define __get_user_8(x, ptr, err) \
> -	__get_user_asm("ld", x, ptr, err)
> +#define __get_mem_8(x, ptr, err) \
> +	__get_mem_asm("ld", x, ptr, err)
>  #else /* !CONFIG_64BIT */
> -#define __get_user_8(x, ptr, err)				\
> +#define __get_mem_8(x, ptr, err)				\
>  do {								\
> -	u32 __user *__ptr = (u32 __user *)(ptr);		\
> +	u32 *__ptr = (u32 *)(ptr);				\

Doesn't casting away __user reduce sparse's utility?

>  	u32 __lo, __hi;						\
>  	__asm__ __volatile__ (					\
>  		"1:\n"						\
> @@ -88,20 +88,20 @@ do {								\
>  } while (0)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
>  
> -#define __get_user_nocheck(x, __gu_ptr, __gu_err)		\
> +#define __get_mem_nocheck(x, __gu_ptr, __gu_err)		\

The patch replaces all get/put_user instances with get/put_mem,
but what about 'gu' and 'pu' instances (which are presumably short
for get/put_user)?

Thanks,
drew

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-15  3:20 [PATCH -next v2 0/2]riscv: some refactorings realted to uaccess and extable Tong Tiangen
2022-08-15  3:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: uaccess: rename __get/put_user_nocheck to __get/put_mem_nocheck Tong Tiangen
2022-08-25 10:56   ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2022-08-26  6:33     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-26  7:43       ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-27 10:39         ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-26  9:30   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-08-27 10:43     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-27 12:49       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-08-29  1:26         ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-15  3:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/2] riscv: extable: add new extable type EX_TYPE_KACCESS_ERR_ZERO support Tong Tiangen
2022-08-25 11:06   ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-26  6:44     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-26  8:16       ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-27 10:39         ` Tong Tiangen
2022-09-21 20:25           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-21 12:23             ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-24  6:31 ` [PATCH -next v2 0/2]riscv: some refactorings realted to uaccess and extable Tong Tiangen
2022-08-24 16:49   ` Conor.Dooley
2022-08-25  3:04     ` Tong Tiangen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220825105600.ezueddmwehob42rf@kamzik \
    --to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=Conor.Dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®