From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz()
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:26:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825172654.GP6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825092311.179-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 05:23:11PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> When CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional
> CPUs need to be added to 'rcu_nocb_mask'. But 'rcu_nocb_mask' may be not
> available now, due to 'rcu_nocbs' is not specified. Check and initialize
> 'rcu_nocb_mask' before using it. This code simplification strictly follows
> this logic, compared with old implementations, unnecessary crossovers are
> avoided and easy to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Much nicer, thank you!
As usual, I could not resist the urge to wordsmith. Could you please
check to make sure that I did not mess anything up?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 4ac3b3d1a19943b1522c0b1d0895aefbb80ec294
Author: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Date: Thu Aug 25 17:23:11 2022 +0800
rcu: Simplify rcu_init_nohz() cpumask handling
In kernels built with either CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional CPUs must be added to rcu_nocb_mask.
Except that kernels booted without the rcu_nocb_mask= will not have
allocated rcu_nocb_mask. And the current rcu_init_nohz() function uses
its need_rcu_nocb_mask and offload_all local variables to track the
rcu_nocb and nohz_full state.
But there is a much simpler approach, namely creating a cpumask pointer
to track the default and then using cpumask_available() to check the
rcu_nocb_mask state. This commit takes this approach, thereby simplifying
and shortening the rcu_init_nohz() function.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 0a5f0ef414845..c8167be2288fa 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1210,45 +1210,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
{
int cpu;
- bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
- bool offload_all = false;
struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
#if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
- if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
- need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
- offload_all = true;
- }
-#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
-
-#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
- if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
- need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
- offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
- }
-#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
+ cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
+ if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
+ cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
+#endif
- if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
+ if (cpumask) {
if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
return;
}
}
+
+ cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
}
if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
return;
-#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
- if (tick_nohz_full_running)
- cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
-#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
-
- if (offload_all)
- cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
-
if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-25 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-25 9:23 [PATCH v5 0/1] rcu/nocb: Delete local variable 'need_rcu_nocb_mask' in rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-25 9:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-25 17:26 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-08-25 19:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-08-26 1:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-26 1:42 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-26 13:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220825172654.GP6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®