mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz()
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 06:45:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220826134520.GS6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43370a3c-8c7a-c7c7-ac2b-bec2bf6c8728@huawei.com>

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 09:42:11AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/8/26 1:26, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 05:23:11PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> >> When CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional
> >> CPUs need to be added to 'rcu_nocb_mask'. But 'rcu_nocb_mask' may be not
> >> available now, due to 'rcu_nocbs' is not specified. Check and initialize
> >> 'rcu_nocb_mask' before using it. This code simplification strictly follows
> >> this logic, compared with old implementations, unnecessary crossovers are
> >> avoided and easy to understand.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> > 
> > Much nicer, thank you!
> > 
> > As usual, I could not resist the urge to wordsmith.  Could you please
> > check to make sure that I did not mess anything up?
> 
> Okay, thank you very much. The boot option name "rcu_nocb_mask=" is
> incorrect, should be "rcu_nocbs=".

Good eyes, thank you!  I will fix this on the next rebase.

							Thanx, Paul

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > commit 4ac3b3d1a19943b1522c0b1d0895aefbb80ec294
> > Author: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> > Date:   Thu Aug 25 17:23:11 2022 +0800
> > 
> >     rcu: Simplify rcu_init_nohz() cpumask handling
> >     
> >     In kernels built with either CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or
> >     CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional CPUs must be added to rcu_nocb_mask.
> >     Except that kernels booted without the rcu_nocb_mask= will not have
> 
> rcu_nocb_mask=   ---->  rcu_nocbs=
> 
> >     allocated rcu_nocb_mask.  And the current rcu_init_nohz() function uses
> >     its need_rcu_nocb_mask and offload_all local variables to track the
> >     rcu_nocb and nohz_full state.
> >     
> >     But there is a much simpler approach, namely creating a cpumask pointer
> >     to track the default and then using cpumask_available() to check the
> >     rcu_nocb_mask state.  This commit takes this approach, thereby simplifying
> >     and shortening the rcu_init_nohz() function.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > index 0a5f0ef414845..c8167be2288fa 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > @@ -1210,45 +1210,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
> >  void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> >  {
> >  	int cpu;
> > -	bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
> > -	bool offload_all = false;
> >  	struct rcu_data *rdp;
> > +	const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
> >  
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
> > -	if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
> > -		need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> > -		offload_all = true;
> > -	}
> > -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
> > -
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> > -	if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
> > -		need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> > -		offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
> > -	}
> > -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> > +	cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
> > +#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> > +	if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> > +		cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
> > +#endif
> >  
> > -	if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> > +	if (cpumask) {
> >  		if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> >  			if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> >  				pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
> >  				return;
> >  			}
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
> >  		rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> > -	if (tick_nohz_full_running)
> > -		cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> > -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> > -
> > -	if (offload_all)
> > -		cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
> > -
> >  	if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
> >  		pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
> >  		cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
> > .
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
>   Zhen Lei

      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-26 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-25  9:23 [PATCH v5 0/1] rcu/nocb: Delete local variable 'need_rcu_nocb_mask' in rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-25  9:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] rcu: Simplify the code logic of rcu_init_nohz() Zhen Lei
2022-08-25 17:26   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-25 19:24     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-08-26  1:36       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-26  1:42     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-26 13:45       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220826134520.GS6159@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®