From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.p.donnelly@oracle.com,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Prevent non-first waiter from spinning in down_write() slowpath
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:04:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220929180413.107374-1-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
A non-first waiter can potentially spin in the for loop of
rwsem_down_write_slowpath() without sleeping but fail to acquire the
lock even if the rwsem is free if the following sequence happens:
Non-first waiter First waiter Lock holder
---------------- ------------ -----------
Acquire wait_lock
rwsem_try_write_lock():
Set handoff bit if RT or
wait too long
Set waiter->handoff_set
Release wait_lock
Acquire wait_lock
Inherit waiter->handoff_set
Release wait_lock
Clear owner
Release lock
if (waiter.handoff_set) {
rwsem_spin_on_owner(();
if (OWNER_NULL)
goto trylock_again;
}
trylock_again:
Acquire wait_lock
rwsem_try_write_lock():
if (first->handoff_set && (waiter != first))
return false;
Release wait_lock
It is especially problematic if the non-first waiter is an RT task and
it is running on the same CPU as the first waiter as this can lead to
live lock.
Fixes: d257cc8cb8d5 ("locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 65f0262f635e..ad676e99e0b3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -628,6 +628,11 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
new = count;
if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) {
+ /*
+ * A waiter (first or not) can set the handoff bit
+ * if it is an RT task or wait in the wait queue
+ * for too long.
+ */
if (has_handoff || (!rt_task(waiter->task) &&
!time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)))
return false;
@@ -643,11 +648,13 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
} while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count, new));
/*
- * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or
- * set the handoff bit.
+ * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or set
+ * the handoff bit. Only the first waiter can have its handoff_set
+ * set here to enable optimistic spinning in slowpath loop.
*/
if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) {
- waiter->handoff_set = true;
+ if (waiter == first)
+ waiter->handoff_set = true;
lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff);
return false;
}
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-29 18:04 Waiman Long [this message]
2022-09-29 18:06 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-30 4:47 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-10-10 10:24 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-10-10 16:57 ` Waiman Long
[not found] ` <03421f0e453143f6ae4a9a7a8a4f47f4@xiaomi.com>
[not found] ` <446288c6c7db4ab2b23f7041baa62335@xiaomi.com>
2022-10-12 13:21 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-29 21:15 ` John Donnelly
2022-09-30 1:09 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-30 4:46 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-09-30 13:57 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-30 5:06 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-09-30 14:08 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-30 16:03 ` Mukesh Ojha
[not found] <20221011104621.231-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-10-11 13:16 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-10-12 13:16 ` Waiman Long
2022-10-12 13:14 ` Waiman Long
[not found] <20221012040410.403-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-10-12 13:19 ` Waiman Long
2022-10-12 13:42 ` Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220929180413.107374-1-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=john.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®