From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.p.donnelly@oracle.com,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Prevent non-first waiter from spinning in down_write() slowpath
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:06:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6530f135-e8ac-bb6c-4715-1ea8f76cf4c4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220929180413.107374-1-longman@redhat.com>
On 9/29/22 14:04, Waiman Long wrote:
> A non-first waiter can potentially spin in the for loop of
> rwsem_down_write_slowpath() without sleeping but fail to acquire the
> lock even if the rwsem is free if the following sequence happens:
>
> Non-first waiter First waiter Lock holder
> ---------------- ------------ -----------
> Acquire wait_lock
> rwsem_try_write_lock():
> Set handoff bit if RT or
> wait too long
> Set waiter->handoff_set
> Release wait_lock
> Acquire wait_lock
> Inherit waiter->handoff_set
> Release wait_lock
> Clear owner
> Release lock
> if (waiter.handoff_set) {
> rwsem_spin_on_owner(();
> if (OWNER_NULL)
> goto trylock_again;
> }
> trylock_again:
> Acquire wait_lock
> rwsem_try_write_lock():
> if (first->handoff_set && (waiter != first))
> return false;
> Release wait_lock
>
> It is especially problematic if the non-first waiter is an RT task and
> it is running on the same CPU as the first waiter as this can lead to
> live lock.
>
> Fixes: d257cc8cb8d5 ("locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Mukesh, can you test if this patch can fix the RT task lockup problem?
Thanks,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-29 18:04 Waiman Long
2022-09-29 18:06 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2022-09-30 4:47 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-10-10 10:24 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-10-10 16:57 ` Waiman Long
[not found] ` <03421f0e453143f6ae4a9a7a8a4f47f4@xiaomi.com>
[not found] ` <446288c6c7db4ab2b23f7041baa62335@xiaomi.com>
2022-10-12 13:21 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-29 21:15 ` John Donnelly
2022-09-30 1:09 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-30 4:46 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-09-30 13:57 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-30 5:06 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-09-30 14:08 ` Waiman Long
2022-09-30 16:03 ` Mukesh Ojha
[not found] <20221011104621.231-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-10-11 13:16 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-10-12 13:16 ` Waiman Long
2022-10-12 13:14 ` Waiman Long
[not found] <20221012040410.403-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-10-12 13:19 ` Waiman Long
2022-10-12 13:42 ` Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6530f135-e8ac-bb6c-4715-1ea8f76cf4c4@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=john.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®