From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,
maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com,
shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: aarch64 cleanup/fixes
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:12:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> (raw)
kvm/selftests/memslots_perf_test doesn't work with 64KB-page-size-host
and 4KB-page-size-guest on aarch64. In the implementation, the host and
guest page size have been hardcoded to 4KB. It's ovbiously not working
on aarch64 which supports 4KB, 16KB, 64KB individually on host and guest.
This series tries to fix it. After the series is applied, the test runs
successfully with 64KB-page-size-host and 4KB-page-size-guest.
# ./memslots_perf_tests -v -s 512
Since we're here, the code is cleaned up a bit as PATCH[1-3] do. The
other patches are fixes to handle the mismatched host/guest page
sized.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com/T/#t
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20221018040454.405719-1-gshan@redhat.com/T/#t
Changelog
=========
v3:
* Improved comments about MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE, which is set
to 64KB in PATCH[v3 4/6] and finally fixed to 192KB in
PATCH[v3 5/6]. (Maciej)
* Use size instead of pages to do the comparison in
test_memslot_move_prepare() (Maciej)
* Use tools/include/linux/sizes.h instead of inventing
our own macros. (Oliver)
v2:
* Pick the smaller value between the ones specified by
user or probed from KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS in PATCH[v2 3/6] (Maciej)
* Improved comments about MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE in
PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
* Avoid mismatched guest page size after VM is started in
prepare_vm() in PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
* Fix condition to check MEM_TEST_{UNMAP, UNMAP_CHUNK}_SIZE
in check_memory_size() in PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
* Define base and huge page size in kvm_util_base.h in
PATCH[v2 5/6] (Sean)
* Add checks on host/guest page size in check_memory_size()
and fail early if any of them exceeds 64KB in PATCH[v2 5/6] (Maciej)
Gavin Shan (6):
KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare_vm()
KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate loop conditions in
prepare_vm()
KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once
KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Support variable guest page size
KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory
KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Report optimal memory slots
.../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 317 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 208 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
--
2.23.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-20 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-20 7:12 Gavin Shan [this message]
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare_vm() Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate loop conditions " Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Support variable guest page size Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Report optimal memory slots Gavin Shan
2022-10-24 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: aarch64 cleanup/fixes Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-11-04 23:57 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-10 10:54 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-10 19:00 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyzha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®