From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com,
zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: aarch64 cleanup/fixes
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 18:54:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3903eeef-e037-9651-6041-0d16c29d67b0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91d563b6-5f1c-5ecc-0a40-7d8838770b22@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Hi Marc,
On 10/25/22 7:18 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 20.10.2022 09:12, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> kvm/selftests/memslots_perf_test doesn't work with 64KB-page-size-host
>> and 4KB-page-size-guest on aarch64. In the implementation, the host and
>> guest page size have been hardcoded to 4KB. It's ovbiously not working
>> on aarch64 which supports 4KB, 16KB, 64KB individually on host and guest.
>>
>> This series tries to fix it. After the series is applied, the test runs
>> successfully with 64KB-page-size-host and 4KB-page-size-guest.
>>
>> # ./memslots_perf_tests -v -s 512
>>
>> Since we're here, the code is cleaned up a bit as PATCH[1-3] do. The
>> other patches are fixes to handle the mismatched host/guest page
>> sized.
>>
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com/T/#t
>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20221018040454.405719-1-gshan@redhat.com/T/#t
>>
>> Changelog
>> =========
>> v3:
>> * Improved comments about MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE, which is set
>> to 64KB in PATCH[v3 4/6] and finally fixed to 192KB in
>> PATCH[v3 5/6]. (Maciej)
>> * Use size instead of pages to do the comparison in
>> test_memslot_move_prepare() (Maciej)
>> * Use tools/include/linux/sizes.h instead of inventing
>> our own macros. (Oliver)
>> v2:
>> * Pick the smaller value between the ones specified by
>> user or probed from KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS in PATCH[v2 3/6] (Maciej)
>> * Improved comments about MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE in
>> PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
>> * Avoid mismatched guest page size after VM is started in
>> prepare_vm() in PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
>> * Fix condition to check MEM_TEST_{UNMAP, UNMAP_CHUNK}_SIZE
>> in check_memory_size() in PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
>> * Define base and huge page size in kvm_util_base.h in
>> PATCH[v2 5/6] (Sean)
>> * Add checks on host/guest page size in check_memory_size()
>> and fail early if any of them exceeds 64KB in PATCH[v2 5/6] (Maciej)
>>
>>
>> Gavin Shan (6):
>> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare_vm()
>> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate loop conditions in
>> prepare_vm()
>> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once
>> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Support variable guest page size
>> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory
>> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Report optimal memory slots
>>
>
> This patch set now looks good to me, so for the whole series:
> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
>
If possible, could you please merge this series to 'next' branch either?
I hope it can be merged early because our downstream needs the fixes to
make the test case work. It's definitely fine to wait for more comments,
but I haven't receive any more comments in last month :)
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-20 7:12 Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare_vm() Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate loop conditions " Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Support variable guest page size Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory Gavin Shan
2022-10-20 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Report optimal memory slots Gavin Shan
2022-10-24 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: aarch64 cleanup/fixes Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-11-04 23:57 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-10 10:54 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2022-11-10 19:00 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3903eeef-e037-9651-6041-0d16c29d67b0@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyzha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®