From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
To: <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<shikemeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:52:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221108045224.19092-1-shikemeng@huawei.com> (raw)
Hi, this is another series contain some bugfix and cleancode patches to
fix temporarily inject limit raise in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection,
correctly initialize decrease_time_jif to trigger inject limit update
in time and some random cleancode.
Thanks!
Kemeng Shi (10):
block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in
bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection
block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow
block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly
block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request
block, bfq: remove unnecessary pointer reference to get async_bfqq
block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in
bfq_add_request
block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator
block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq
block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data
block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always
greater than 0
block/bfq-iosched.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
block/bfq-iosched.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--
2.30.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 4:52 Kemeng Shi [this message]
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 01/10] block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 02/10] block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 03/10] block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 04/10] block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 05/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary pointer reference to get async_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 06/10] block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in bfq_add_request Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 07/10] block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 08/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 09/10] block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 10/10] block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always greater than 0 Kemeng Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221108045224.19092-1-shikemeng@huawei.com \
--to=shikemeng@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®