From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
To: <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<shikemeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:52:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221108045224.19092-8-shikemeng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221108045224.19092-1-shikemeng@huawei.com>
We have already avoided a circular list in bfq_setup_merge (see comments
in bfq_setup_merge() for details), so bfq_queue will not appear in it's
new_bfqq list. Just remove this check.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index be923be48647..cffc5ff66ee6 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -5339,8 +5339,6 @@ void bfq_put_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
*/
__bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq;
while (__bfqq) {
- if (__bfqq == bfqq)
- break;
next = __bfqq->new_bfqq;
bfq_put_queue(__bfqq);
__bfqq = next;
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 4:52 [PATCH 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 01/10] block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 02/10] block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 03/10] block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 04/10] block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 05/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary pointer reference to get async_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 06/10] block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in bfq_add_request Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 08/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 09/10] block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data Kemeng Shi
2022-11-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 10/10] block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always greater than 0 Kemeng Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221108045224.19092-8-shikemeng@huawei.com \
--to=shikemeng@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®