* [PATCH] test_kprobes: Fix implicit declaration error of test_kprobes
@ 2022-11-21 3:06 Li Hua
2022-11-22 4:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Li Hua @ 2022-11-21 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mhiramat, rostedt, akpm
Cc: nathan, ananth, linux-kernel, weiyongjun1, yusongping, hucool.lihua
If KPROBES_SANITY_TEST and ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE is enabled, but
STACKTRACE is not set. Build failed as below:
lib/test_kprobes.c: In function ‘stacktrace_return_handler’:
lib/test_kprobes.c:228:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘stack_trace_save’; did you mean ‘stacktrace_driver’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
ret = stack_trace_save(stack_buf, STACK_BUF_SIZE, 0);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
stacktrace_driver
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
scripts/Makefile.build:250: recipe for target 'lib/test_kprobes.o' failed
make[2]: *** [lib/test_kprobes.o] Error 1
To fix this error, Select STACKTRACE if ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE is enabled.
Fixes: 1f6d3a8f5e39 ("kprobes: Add a test case for stacktrace from kretprobe handler")
Signed-off-by: Li Hua <hucool.lihua@huawei.com>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index c3c0b077ade3..a1005415f0f4 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2107,6 +2107,7 @@ config KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
depends on KPROBES
depends on KUNIT
+ select STACKTRACE if ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE
default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
help
This option provides for testing basic kprobes functionality on
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] test_kprobes: Fix implicit declaration error of test_kprobes
2022-11-21 3:06 [PATCH] test_kprobes: Fix implicit declaration error of test_kprobes Li Hua
@ 2022-11-22 4:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2022-11-22 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Hua
Cc: rostedt, akpm, nathan, ananth, linux-kernel, weiyongjun1, yusongping
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:06:20 +0800
Li Hua <hucool.lihua@huawei.com> wrote:
> If KPROBES_SANITY_TEST and ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE is enabled, but
> STACKTRACE is not set. Build failed as below:
>
> lib/test_kprobes.c: In function ‘stacktrace_return_handler’:
> lib/test_kprobes.c:228:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘stack_trace_save’; did you mean ‘stacktrace_driver’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> ret = stack_trace_save(stack_buf, STACK_BUF_SIZE, 0);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> stacktrace_driver
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> scripts/Makefile.build:250: recipe for target 'lib/test_kprobes.o' failed
> make[2]: *** [lib/test_kprobes.o] Error 1
>
> To fix this error, Select STACKTRACE if ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE is enabled.
Good catch!
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thanks!
>
> Fixes: 1f6d3a8f5e39 ("kprobes: Add a test case for stacktrace from kretprobe handler")
> Signed-off-by: Li Hua <hucool.lihua@huawei.com>
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index c3c0b077ade3..a1005415f0f4 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -2107,6 +2107,7 @@ config KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> depends on KPROBES
> depends on KUNIT
> + select STACKTRACE if ARCH_CORRECT_STACKTRACE_ON_KRETPROBE
> default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> help
> This option provides for testing basic kprobes functionality on
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-22 4:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-21 3:06 [PATCH] test_kprobes: Fix implicit declaration error of test_kprobes Li Hua
2022-11-22 4:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®