From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] sched: Teach arch_asym_cpu_priority() the idle state of SMT siblings
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:35:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221122203532.15013-4-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221122203532.15013-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Some processors (e.g., Intel processors with ITMT) use asym_packing to
balance load between physical cores with SMT. In such case, a core with all
its SMT siblings idle is more desirable than another with one or more busy
siblings.
Other processors (e.g, Power7 with SMT8) use asym_packing to balance load
among SMT siblings of different priority, regardless of their idle state.
Add a new parameter, check_smt, that architectures can use as needed.
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v1:
* Introduced this patch.
---
arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c | 2 +-
include/linux/sched/topology.h | 2 +-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
index 9ff480e94511..4cb5a5e4fa47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void sched_clear_itmt_support(void)
mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
}
-int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)
+int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt)
{
return per_cpu(sched_core_priority, cpu);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
index 816df6cc444e..87b64b9776f6 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline int cpu_numa_flags(void)
}
#endif
-extern int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu);
+extern int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt);
struct sched_domain_attr {
int relax_domain_level;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d18947a9c03e..0e4251f83807 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -142,8 +142,11 @@ __setup("sched_thermal_decay_shift=", setup_sched_thermal_decay_shift);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* For asym packing, by default the lower numbered CPU has higher priority.
+ *
+ * When doing ASYM_PACKING at the "MC" or higher domains, architectures may
+ * want to check the idle state of the SMT siblngs of @cpu.
*/
-int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)
+int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu, bool check_smt)
{
return -cpu;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 0fc7c0130755..e5e52c2e82de 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -802,7 +802,8 @@ static inline long se_weight(struct sched_entity *se)
*/
static inline bool sched_asym_prefer(int a, int b, bool check_smt)
{
- return arch_asym_cpu_priority(a) > arch_asym_cpu_priority(b);
+ return arch_asym_cpu_priority(a, check_smt) >
+ arch_asym_cpu_priority(b, check_smt);
}
struct perf_domain {
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 20:35 [PATCH v2 0/7] x86/sched: Avoid unnecessary migrations within SMT domains Ricardo Neri
2022-11-22 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] sched/fair: Generalize asym_packing logic for SMT local sched group Ricardo Neri
2022-12-06 17:22 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-12 17:53 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-21 13:03 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-22 4:32 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-22 11:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-23 13:11 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-22 16:55 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-12-29 4:00 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-01-11 16:04 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-01-13 19:02 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-01-16 4:05 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-01-16 19:07 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-01-17 12:49 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-11-22 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] sched: Prepare sched_asym_prefer() to handle idle state of SMT siblings Ricardo Neri
2022-11-22 20:35 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2022-12-06 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] sched: Teach arch_asym_cpu_priority() the " Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-12 17:54 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-21 17:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-22 4:55 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-22 16:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-22 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sched/fair: Introduce sched_smt_siblings_idle() Ricardo Neri
2022-12-06 18:03 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-12 17:54 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-22 11:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-22 16:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-12-24 5:28 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-28 15:29 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-30 0:17 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-01-10 19:21 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-22 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] x86/sched: Remove SD_ASYM_PACKING from the "SMT" domain Ricardo Neri
2022-12-08 16:03 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-12-14 16:59 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-15 16:48 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-12-20 0:42 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-12-22 16:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-12-29 19:02 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-01-10 19:17 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-01-13 1:31 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-11-22 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86/sched/itmt: Give all SMT siblings of a core the same priority Ricardo Neri
2022-11-22 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] x86/sched/itmt: Consider the idle state of SMT siblings Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221122203532.15013-4-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®