mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Connor O'Brien" <connoro@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/3] locktorture: Allow non-rtmutex lock types to be boosted
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 01:21:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221123012104.3317665-3-joel@joelfernandes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221123012104.3317665-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>

Currently RT boosting is only done for rtmutex_lock, however with proxy
execution, we also have the mutex_lock participating in priorities. To
exercise the testing better, add RT boosting to other lock testing types
as well, using a new knob (rt_boost).

Tested with boot parameters:
locktorture.torture_type=mutex_lock
locktorture.onoff_interval=1
locktorture.nwriters_stress=8
locktorture.stutter=0
locktorture.rt_boost=1
locktorture.rt_boost_factor=1
locktorture.nlocks=3

For the rtmutex test, rt_boost is always enabled even if disabling is
requested.

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index bc3557677eed..5a388ac96a9b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ torture_param(int, shutdown_secs, 0, "Shutdown time (j), <= zero to disable.");
 torture_param(int, stat_interval, 60,
 	     "Number of seconds between stats printk()s");
 torture_param(int, stutter, 5, "Number of jiffies to run/halt test, 0=disable");
+torture_param(int, rt_boost, 0, "Perform an rt-boost from the writer, always 1 for rtmutex_lock");
 torture_param(int, verbose, 1,
 	     "Enable verbose debugging printk()s");
 torture_param(int, nlocks, 1,
@@ -129,15 +130,44 @@ static void torture_lock_busted_write_unlock(int tid __maybe_unused)
 	  /* BUGGY, do not use in real life!!! */
 }
 
-static void torture_boost_dummy(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
+static void torture_rt_boost(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
 {
-	/* Only rtmutexes care about priority */
+	const unsigned int factor = 50000; /* yes, quite arbitrary */
+
+	if (!rt_boost)
+		return;
+
+	if (!rt_task(current)) {
+		/*
+		 * Boost priority once every ~50k operations. When the
+		 * task tries to take the lock, the rtmutex it will account
+		 * for the new priority, and do any corresponding pi-dance.
+		 */
+		if (trsp && !(torture_random(trsp) %
+			      (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor))) {
+			sched_set_fifo(current);
+		} else /* common case, do nothing */
+			return;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * The task will remain boosted for another ~500k operations,
+		 * then restored back to its original prio, and so forth.
+		 *
+		 * When @trsp is nil, we want to force-reset the task for
+		 * stopping the kthread.
+		 */
+		if (!trsp || !(torture_random(trsp) %
+			       (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor * 2))) {
+			sched_set_normal(current, 0);
+		} else /* common case, do nothing */
+			return;
+	}
 }
 
 static struct lock_torture_ops lock_busted_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_lock_busted_write_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_lock_busted_write_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_lock_busted_write_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -181,7 +211,7 @@ __releases(torture_spinlock)
 static struct lock_torture_ops spin_lock_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_spin_lock_write_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_spin_lock_write_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_spin_lock_write_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -208,7 +238,7 @@ __releases(torture_spinlock)
 static struct lock_torture_ops spin_lock_irq_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_spin_lock_write_lock_irq,
 	.write_delay	= torture_spin_lock_write_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_lock_spin_write_unlock_irq,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -277,7 +307,7 @@ __releases(torture_rwlock)
 static struct lock_torture_ops rw_lock_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_rwlock_write_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rwlock_write_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_rwlock_write_unlock,
 	.readlock       = torture_rwlock_read_lock,
 	.read_delay     = torture_rwlock_read_delay,
@@ -320,7 +350,7 @@ __releases(torture_rwlock)
 static struct lock_torture_ops rw_lock_irq_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_rwlock_write_lock_irq,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rwlock_write_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_rwlock_write_unlock_irq,
 	.readlock       = torture_rwlock_read_lock_irq,
 	.read_delay     = torture_rwlock_read_delay,
@@ -362,7 +392,7 @@ __releases(torture_mutex)
 static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_mutex_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_mutex_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_mutex_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -460,7 +490,7 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops ww_mutex_lock_ops = {
 	.exit		= torture_ww_mutex_exit,
 	.writelock	= torture_ww_mutex_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_mutex_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_ww_mutex_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -471,6 +501,11 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops ww_mutex_lock_ops = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
 static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(torture_rtmutex);
 
+static void torture_rtmutex_init(void)
+{
+	rt_boost = 1;
+}
+
 static int torture_rtmutex_lock(int tid __maybe_unused)
 __acquires(torture_rtmutex)
 {
@@ -478,37 +513,6 @@ __acquires(torture_rtmutex)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void torture_rtmutex_boost(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
-{
-	const unsigned int factor = 50000; /* yes, quite arbitrary */
-
-	if (!rt_task(current)) {
-		/*
-		 * Boost priority once every ~50k operations. When the
-		 * task tries to take the lock, the rtmutex it will account
-		 * for the new priority, and do any corresponding pi-dance.
-		 */
-		if (trsp && !(torture_random(trsp) %
-			      (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor))) {
-			sched_set_fifo(current);
-		} else /* common case, do nothing */
-			return;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * The task will remain boosted for another ~500k operations,
-		 * then restored back to its original prio, and so forth.
-		 *
-		 * When @trsp is nil, we want to force-reset the task for
-		 * stopping the kthread.
-		 */
-		if (!trsp || !(torture_random(trsp) %
-			       (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor * 2))) {
-			sched_set_normal(current, 0);
-		} else /* common case, do nothing */
-			return;
-	}
-}
-
 static void torture_rtmutex_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
 {
 	const unsigned long shortdelay_us = 2;
@@ -535,9 +539,10 @@ __releases(torture_rtmutex)
 }
 
 static struct lock_torture_ops rtmutex_lock_ops = {
+	.init		= torture_rtmutex_init,
 	.writelock	= torture_rtmutex_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rtmutex_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_rtmutex_boost,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_rtmutex_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -604,7 +609,7 @@ __releases(torture_rwsem)
 static struct lock_torture_ops rwsem_lock_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_rwsem_down_write,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rwsem_write_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_rwsem_up_write,
 	.readlock       = torture_rwsem_down_read,
 	.read_delay     = torture_rwsem_read_delay,
@@ -656,7 +661,7 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops percpu_rwsem_lock_ops = {
 	.exit		= torture_percpu_rwsem_exit,
 	.writelock	= torture_percpu_rwsem_down_write,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rwsem_write_delay,
-	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rt_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_percpu_rwsem_up_write,
 	.readlock       = torture_percpu_rwsem_down_read,
 	.read_delay     = torture_rwsem_read_delay,
-- 
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-23  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-23  1:21 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Patches on top of PE series Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-11-23  1:21 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] sched/pe: Exclude balance callback queuing during proxy()'s migrate Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-12-09 15:07   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-09 16:52     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-12 14:39       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-15 23:12         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-15 23:31           ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-23  1:21 ` Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2022-12-07 22:14   ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] locktorture: Allow non-rtmutex lock types to be boosted Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-07 22:23     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-07 22:42       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-08  5:06       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-21  4:21   ` Chen Yu
2022-11-23  1:21 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] locktorture: Make the rt_boost factor a tunable Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-12-07 22:15   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-21  4:28   ` Chen Yu
2023-01-05 18:27     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-05 20:19       ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221123012104.3317665-3-joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=connoro@google.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®