From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
"Daniel Bristot de Oliveira" <bristot@redhat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<kernel-team@android.com>, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] locktorture: Make the rt_boost factor a tunable
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:28:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6KLd0X0aJxxyNLJ@chenyu5-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221123012104.3317665-4-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On 2022-11-23 at 01:21:04 +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> The rt boosting in locktorture has a factor variable large enough that
> boosting only happens once every minute or so. Add a tunable to educe
> the factor so that boosting happens more often, to test paths and arrive
> at failure modes earlier. With this change, I can set the factor to
> like 50 and have the boosting happens every 10 seconds or so.
>
> Tested with boot parameters:
> locktorture.torture_type=mutex_lock
> locktorture.onoff_interval=1
> locktorture.nwriters_stress=8
> locktorture.stutter=0
> locktorture.rt_boost=1
> locktorture.rt_boost_factor=50
> locktorture.nlocks=3
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> index 5a388ac96a9b..e4529c2166e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ torture_param(int, stat_interval, 60,
> "Number of seconds between stats printk()s");
> torture_param(int, stutter, 5, "Number of jiffies to run/halt test, 0=disable");
> torture_param(int, rt_boost, 0, "Perform an rt-boost from the writer, always 1 for rtmutex_lock");
> +torture_param(int, rt_boost_factor, 50000, "A factor determining how often rt-boost happens");
> torture_param(int, verbose, 1,
> "Enable verbose debugging printk()s");
> torture_param(int, nlocks, 1,
> @@ -132,15 +133,15 @@ static void torture_lock_busted_write_unlock(int tid __maybe_unused)
>
> static void torture_rt_boost(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
> {
> - const unsigned int factor = 50000; /* yes, quite arbitrary */
> + const unsigned int factor = rt_boost_factor; /* yes, quite arbitrary */
>
> if (!rt_boost)
> return;
>
> if (!rt_task(current)) {
> /*
> - * Boost priority once every ~50k operations. When the
> - * task tries to take the lock, the rtmutex it will account
> + * Boost priority once every rt_boost_factor operations. When
> + * the task tries to take the lock, the rtmutex it will account
> * for the new priority, and do any corresponding pi-dance.
> */
> if (trsp && !(torture_random(trsp) %
> @@ -150,8 +151,9 @@ static void torture_rt_boost(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
> return;
> } else {
> /*
> - * The task will remain boosted for another ~500k operations,
> - * then restored back to its original prio, and so forth.
> + * The task will remain boosted for another 10*rt_boost_factor
Maybe I understand incorrectly, the code is
cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor * 2, should it be 2 rather than 10?
May I know where the 10 comes from?
thanks,
Chenyu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-21 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-23 1:21 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Patches on top of PE series Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-11-23 1:21 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] sched/pe: Exclude balance callback queuing during proxy()'s migrate Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-12-09 15:07 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-09 16:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-12 14:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-12-15 23:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-15 23:31 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-23 1:21 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] locktorture: Allow non-rtmutex lock types to be boosted Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-12-07 22:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-07 22:23 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-07 22:42 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-08 5:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-21 4:21 ` Chen Yu
2022-11-23 1:21 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] locktorture: Make the rt_boost factor a tunable Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-12-07 22:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-21 4:28 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2023-01-05 18:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-05 20:19 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6KLd0X0aJxxyNLJ@chenyu5-mobl1 \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®