From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>, <yhs@fb.com>,
<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
<sdf@google.com>, <haoluo@google.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<illusionist.neo@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mykolal@fb.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>, <memxor@gmail.com>,
<colin.i.king@gmail.com>, <asavkov@redhat.com>, <delyank@fb.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: Support kernel function call in 32-bit ARM
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:45:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221126094530.226629-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com> (raw)
1. Patch1 is dependent patch to fix zext extension error in 32-bit ARM.
2. Patch2 supports bpf fkunc in 32-bit ARM for EABI.
3. Patch3 is used to add test cases to cover some parameter scenarios
states by AAPCS.
4. Patch4 fix a comment error.
The following is the test_progs result in the 32-bit ARM environment:
# uname -m
armv7l
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# ./test_progs -t kfunc_call
#1/1 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_fail:OK
#1/2 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_null_fail:OK
#1/3 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_rdonly:OK
#1/4 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_use_after_free:OK
#1/5 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_oob:OK
#1/6 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_not_const:OK
#1/7 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_mem_acquire_fail:OK
#1/8 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test1:OK
#1/9 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test2:OK
#1/10 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test4:OK
#1/11 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test5:OK
#1/12 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test6:OK
#1/13 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id:OK
#1/14 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem:OK
#1/15 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test:OK
#1/16 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_null:OK
#1/19 kfunc_call/destructive:OK
---
Changes since v2:
- Remove patches to adjust sk size check for CO_RE in 32-bit arch.
- Add check of kfunc's return value in insn_def_regno.
- Adjust is_reg64 for insn_def_regno.
- The check of CONFIG_AEABI is moved from emit_kfunc_call to
bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call.
- Fix a comment error in fixup_kfunc_call.
Yang Jihong (4):
bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext
extension
bpf: Add kernel function call support in 32-bit ARM for EABI
bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit
parameters
bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 46 +++++-
net/bpf/test_run.c | 18 +++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 3 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 52 +++++++
5 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.30.GIT
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-26 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-26 9:45 Yang Jihong [this message]
2022-11-26 9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext extension Yang Jihong
2022-11-28 1:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-28 12:40 ` Yang Jihong
2022-11-28 16:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-03 2:58 ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-03 16:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-05 1:19 ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-07 8:49 ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-02 4:11 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-26 9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] bpf: Add kernel function call support in 32-bit ARM for EABI Yang Jihong
2022-11-26 9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit parameters Yang Jihong
2022-11-26 9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function Yang Jihong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221126094530.226629-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com \
--to=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=asavkov@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=delyank@fb.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=illusionist.neo@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®