mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>, <yhs@fb.com>,
	<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	<sdf@google.com>, <haoluo@google.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<illusionist.neo@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mykolal@fb.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
	<benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>, <memxor@gmail.com>,
	<colin.i.king@gmail.com>, <asavkov@redhat.com>, <delyank@fb.com>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext extension
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:45:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221126094530.226629-2-yangjihong1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221126094530.226629-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com>

For ARM32 architecture, if data width of kfunc return value is 32 bits,
need to do explicit zero extension for high 32-bit, insn_def_regno should
return dst_reg for BPF_JMP type of BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL. Otherwise,
opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32 returns -EFAULT, resulting in BPF failure.

Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 264b3dc714cc..193ea927aa69 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1927,6 +1927,21 @@ find_kfunc_desc(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 func_id, u16 offset)
 		       sizeof(tab->descs[0]), kfunc_desc_cmp_by_id_off);
 }
 
+static int kfunc_desc_cmp_by_imm(const void *a, const void *b);
+
+static const struct bpf_kfunc_desc *
+find_kfunc_desc_by_imm(const struct bpf_prog *prog, s32 imm)
+{
+	struct bpf_kfunc_desc desc = {
+		.imm = imm,
+	};
+	struct bpf_kfunc_desc_tab *tab;
+
+	tab = prog->aux->kfunc_tab;
+	return bsearch(&desc, tab->descs, tab->nr_descs,
+		       sizeof(tab->descs[0]), kfunc_desc_cmp_by_imm);
+}
+
 static struct btf *__find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 					 s16 offset)
 {
@@ -2342,6 +2357,13 @@ static bool is_reg64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			 */
 			if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
 				return false;
+
+			/* Kfunc call will reach here because of insn_has_def32,
+			 * conservatively return TRUE.
+			 */
+			if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL)
+				return true;
+
 			/* Helper call will reach here because of arg type
 			 * check, conservatively return TRUE.
 			 */
@@ -2405,10 +2427,26 @@ static bool is_reg64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 }
 
 /* Return the regno defined by the insn, or -1. */
-static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+static int insn_def_regno(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
 	switch (BPF_CLASS(insn->code)) {
 	case BPF_JMP:
+		if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL) {
+			const struct bpf_kfunc_desc *desc;
+
+			/* The value of desc cannot be NULL */
+			desc = find_kfunc_desc_by_imm(env->prog, insn->imm);
+
+			/* A kfunc can return void.
+			 * The btf type of the kfunc's return value needs
+			 * to be checked against "void" first
+			 */
+			if (desc->func_model.ret_size == 0)
+				return -1;
+			else
+				return insn->dst_reg;
+		}
+		fallthrough;
 	case BPF_JMP32:
 	case BPF_ST:
 		return -1;
@@ -2430,7 +2468,7 @@ static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 /* Return TRUE if INSN has defined any 32-bit value explicitly. */
 static bool insn_has_def32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
-	int dst_reg = insn_def_regno(insn);
+	int dst_reg = insn_def_regno(env, insn);
 
 	if (dst_reg == -1)
 		return false;
@@ -13335,7 +13373,7 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		int load_reg;
 
 		insn = insns[adj_idx];
-		load_reg = insn_def_regno(&insn);
+		load_reg = insn_def_regno(env, &insn);
 		if (!aux[adj_idx].zext_dst) {
 			u8 code, class;
 			u32 imm_rnd;
-- 
2.30.GIT


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-26  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-26  9:45 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: Support kernel function call in 32-bit ARM Yang Jihong
2022-11-26  9:45 ` Yang Jihong [this message]
2022-11-28  1:57   ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext extension Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-28 12:40     ` Yang Jihong
2022-11-28 16:41       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-03  2:58         ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-03 16:40           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-05  1:19             ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-07  8:49               ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-02  4:11   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-26  9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] bpf: Add kernel function call support in 32-bit ARM for EABI Yang Jihong
2022-11-26  9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit parameters Yang Jihong
2022-11-26  9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function Yang Jihong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221126094530.226629-2-yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    --to=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=asavkov@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=delyank@fb.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=illusionist.neo@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®