From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
Jiaxi Chen <jiaxi.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jing Liu <jing2.liu@intel.com>,
Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: SVM: implement support for vNMI
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:37:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221129193717.513824-11-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129193717.513824-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
This patch implements support for injecting pending
NMIs via the .kvm_x86_set_hw_nmi_pending using new AMD's vNMI
feature.
Note that the vNMI can't cause a VM exit, which is needed
when a nested guest intercepts NMIs.
Therefore to avoid breaking nesting, the vNMI is inhibited while
a nested guest is running and instead, the legacy NMI window
detection and delivery method is used.
While it is possible to passthrough the vNMI if a nested guest
doesn't intercept NMIs, such usage is very uncommon, and it's
not worth to optimize for.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 42 +++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 10 ++++
3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index e891318595113e..5bea672bf8b12d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -623,6 +623,42 @@ static bool is_evtinj_nmi(u32 evtinj)
return type == SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_NMI;
}
+static void nested_svm_save_vnmi(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
+{
+ struct vmcb *vmcb01 = svm->vmcb01.ptr;
+
+ /*
+ * Copy the vNMI state back to software NMI tracking state
+ * for the duration of the nested run
+ */
+
+ svm->nmi_masked = vmcb01->control.int_ctl & V_NMI_MASK;
+ svm->vcpu.arch.nmi_pending += vmcb01->control.int_ctl & V_NMI_PENDING;
+}
+
+static void nested_svm_restore_vnmi(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
+ struct vmcb *vmcb01 = svm->vmcb01.ptr;
+
+ /*
+ * Restore the vNMI state from the software NMI tracking state
+ * after a nested run
+ */
+
+ if (svm->nmi_masked)
+ vmcb01->control.int_ctl |= V_NMI_MASK;
+ else
+ vmcb01->control.int_ctl &= ~V_NMI_MASK;
+
+ if (vcpu->arch.nmi_pending) {
+ vcpu->arch.nmi_pending--;
+ vmcb01->control.int_ctl |= V_NMI_PENDING;
+ } else
+ vmcb01->control.int_ctl &= ~V_NMI_PENDING;
+}
+
+
static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
unsigned long vmcb12_rip,
unsigned long vmcb12_csbase)
@@ -646,6 +682,9 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
else
int_ctl_vmcb01_bits |= (V_GIF_MASK | V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK);
+ if (vnmi)
+ nested_svm_save_vnmi(svm);
+
/* Copied from vmcb01. msrpm_base can be overwritten later. */
vmcb02->control.nested_ctl = vmcb01->control.nested_ctl;
vmcb02->control.iopm_base_pa = vmcb01->control.iopm_base_pa;
@@ -1049,6 +1088,9 @@ int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm_update_lbrv(vcpu);
}
+ if (vnmi)
+ nested_svm_restore_vnmi(svm);
+
/*
* On vmexit the GIF is set to false and
* no event can be injected in L1.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index cfed6ab29c839a..bf10adcf3170a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ module_param(dump_invalid_vmcb, bool, 0644);
bool intercept_smi = true;
module_param(intercept_smi, bool, 0444);
+bool vnmi = true;
+module_param(vnmi, bool, 0444);
static bool svm_gp_erratum_intercept = true;
@@ -1299,6 +1301,9 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
avic_init_vmcb(svm, vmcb);
+ if (vnmi)
+ svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_NMI_ENABLE;
+
if (vgif) {
svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_STGI);
svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CLGI);
@@ -3487,6 +3492,39 @@ static void svm_inject_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
++vcpu->stat.nmi_injections;
}
+
+static bool svm_get_hw_nmi_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+
+ if (!is_vnmi_enabled(svm))
+ return false;
+
+ return !!(svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl & V_NMI_MASK);
+}
+
+static bool svm_set_hw_nmi_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+
+ if (!is_vnmi_enabled(svm))
+ return false;
+
+ if (svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl & V_NMI_PENDING)
+ return false;
+
+ svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_NMI_PENDING;
+ vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_INTR);
+
+ /*
+ * NMI isn't yet technically injected but
+ * this rough estimation should be good enough
+ */
+ ++vcpu->stat.nmi_injections;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void svm_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool reinjected)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
@@ -3582,11 +3620,38 @@ static void svm_update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int tpr, int irr)
svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE);
}
+static bool svm_get_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+
+ if (is_vnmi_enabled(svm))
+ return svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl & V_NMI_MASK;
+ else
+ return svm->nmi_masked;
+}
+
+static void svm_set_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool masked)
+{
+ struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+
+ if (is_vnmi_enabled(svm)) {
+ if (masked)
+ svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_NMI_MASK;
+ else
+ svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl &= ~V_NMI_MASK;
+ } else {
+ svm->nmi_masked = masked;
+ if (masked)
+ svm_enable_iret_interception(svm);
+ else
+ svm_disable_iret_interception(svm);
+ }
+}
+
bool svm_nmi_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
- bool ret;
if (!gif_set(svm))
return true;
@@ -3594,10 +3659,10 @@ bool svm_nmi_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_exit_on_nmi(svm))
return false;
- ret = (vmcb->control.int_state & SVM_INTERRUPT_SHADOW_MASK) ||
- (svm->nmi_masked);
+ if (svm_get_nmi_mask(vcpu))
+ return true;
- return ret;
+ return vmcb->control.int_state & SVM_INTERRUPT_SHADOW_MASK;
}
static int svm_nmi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
@@ -3615,24 +3680,6 @@ static int svm_nmi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
return 1;
}
-static bool svm_get_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- return to_svm(vcpu)->nmi_masked;
-}
-
-static void svm_set_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool masked)
-{
- struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
-
- if (masked) {
- svm->nmi_masked = true;
- svm_enable_iret_interception(svm);
- } else {
- svm->nmi_masked = false;
- svm_disable_iret_interception(svm);
- }
-}
-
bool svm_interrupt_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
@@ -3725,10 +3772,16 @@ static void svm_enable_nmi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/*
* Something prevents NMI from been injected. Single step over possible
* problem (IRET or exception injection or interrupt shadow)
+ *
+ * With vNMI we should never need an NMI window
+ * (we can always inject vNMI either by setting VNMI_PENDING or by EVENTINJ)
*/
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(is_vnmi_enabled(svm)))
+ return;
+
svm->nmi_singlestep_guest_rflags = svm_get_rflags(vcpu);
- svm->nmi_singlestep = true;
svm->vmcb->save.rflags |= (X86_EFLAGS_TF | X86_EFLAGS_RF);
+ svm->nmi_singlestep = true;
}
static void svm_flush_tlb_current(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -4770,6 +4823,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = {
.patch_hypercall = svm_patch_hypercall,
.inject_irq = svm_inject_irq,
.inject_nmi = svm_inject_nmi,
+ .get_hw_nmi_pending = svm_get_hw_nmi_pending,
+ .set_hw_nmi_pending = svm_set_hw_nmi_pending,
.inject_exception = svm_inject_exception,
.cancel_injection = svm_cancel_injection,
.interrupt_allowed = svm_interrupt_allowed,
@@ -5058,6 +5113,16 @@ static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void)
pr_info("Virtual GIF supported\n");
}
+
+ vnmi = vgif && vnmi && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_VNMI);
+ if (vnmi)
+ pr_info("Virtual NMI enabled\n");
+
+ if (!vnmi) {
+ svm_x86_ops.get_hw_nmi_pending = NULL;
+ svm_x86_ops.set_hw_nmi_pending = NULL;
+ }
+
if (lbrv) {
if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LBRV))
lbrv = false;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 587ddc150f9f34..0b7e1790fadde1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ extern u32 msrpm_offsets[MSRPM_OFFSETS] __read_mostly;
extern bool npt_enabled;
extern int vgif;
extern bool intercept_smi;
+extern bool vnmi;
enum avic_modes {
AVIC_MODE_NONE = 0,
@@ -553,6 +554,15 @@ static inline bool is_x2apic_msrpm_offset(u32 offset)
(msr < (APIC_BASE_MSR + 0x100));
}
+static inline bool is_vnmi_enabled(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
+{
+ /* L1's vNMI is inhibited while nested guest is running */
+ if (is_guest_mode(&svm->vcpu))
+ return false;
+
+ return !!(svm->vmcb01.ptr->control.int_ctl & V_NMI_ENABLE);
+}
+
/* svm.c */
#define MSR_INVALID 0xffffffffU
--
2.26.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 19:37 [PATCH v2 00/11] SVM: vNMI (with my fixes) Maxim Levitsky
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: nSVM: don't sync back tlb_ctl on nested VM exit Maxim Levitsky
2022-12-05 14:05 ` Santosh Shukla
2022-12-06 12:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: nSVM: clean up the copying of V_INTR bits from vmcb02 to vmcb12 Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-28 0:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-31 1:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-24 14:38 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-02-24 16:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: nSVM: explicitly raise KVM_REQ_EVENT on nested VM exit if L1 doesn't intercept interrupts Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-28 0:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 18:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: SVM: drop the SVM specific H_FLAGS Maxim Levitsky
2022-12-05 15:31 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-01-28 0:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: x86: emulator: stop using raw host flags Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-28 0:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-24 14:38 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: SVM: add wrappers to enable/disable IRET interception Maxim Levitsky
2022-12-05 15:41 ` Santosh Shukla
2022-12-06 12:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-12-08 12:09 ` Santosh Shukla
2022-12-08 13:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-31 21:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-13 14:50 ` Santosh Shukla
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: x86: add a delayed hardware NMI injection interface Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-28 1:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-31 21:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-08 9:35 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-02-08 9:32 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-02-24 14:39 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-31 22:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-01 0:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-08 9:51 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-02-08 16:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-08 9:43 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-02-08 16:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-14 10:22 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-02-15 22:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-16 0:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-17 7:56 ` Santosh Shukla
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/cpu: Add CPUID feature bit for VNMI Maxim Levitsky
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: SVM: Add VNMI bit definition Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-31 22:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-02 9:42 ` Santosh Shukla
2022-11-29 19:37 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-12-04 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: SVM: implement support for vNMI Maxim Levitsky
2022-12-05 17:07 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-01-28 1:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-10 12:02 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-02-01 0:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-01 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-10 12:24 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-02-10 16:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-29 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: nSVM: implement support for nested VNMI Maxim Levitsky
2022-12-05 17:14 ` Santosh Shukla
2022-12-06 12:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-12-08 12:11 ` Santosh Shukla
2023-02-01 0:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-06 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] SVM: vNMI (with my fixes) Santosh Shukla
2023-02-01 0:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-20 10:27 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-12-21 18:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-15 9:05 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-28 1:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-01 19:13 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221129193717.513824-11-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiaxi.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wyes.karny@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®