mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
To: reinette.chatre@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: Babu.Moger@amd.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	eranian@google.com, hpa@zytor.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	quic_jiles@quicinc.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/resctrl: Avoid redundant counter read in __mon_event_count()
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:41:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221220164132.443083-2-peternewman@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221220164132.443083-1-peternewman@google.com>

__mon_event_count() does the per-RMID, per-domain work for
user-initiated event count reads and the initialization of new monitor
groups.

In the initialization case, after resctrl_arch_reset_rmid() calls
__rmid_read() to record an initial count for a new monitor group, it
immediately calls resctrl_arch_rmid_read(). This re-read of the hardware
counter is unnecessary and the following computations are ignored by the
caller during initialization.

Following return from resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(), just clear the
mbm_state and return. This involves moving the mbm_state lookup into the
rr->first case, as it's not needed for regular event count reads: the
QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID case was redundant with the accumulating logic at
the end of the function.

Signed-off-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
v3:
 - changelog clarifications suggested by Reinette
v2:
 (patch introduced)

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221214160856.2164207-2-peternewman@google.com/
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 43 ++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
index 77538abeb72a..e708df478077 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -366,41 +366,36 @@ void free_rmid(u32 rmid)
 		list_add_tail(&entry->list, &rmid_free_lru);
 }
 
+static struct mbm_state *get_mbm_state(struct rdt_domain *d, u32 rmid,
+				       enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
+{
+	switch (evtid) {
+	case QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID:
+		return &d->mbm_total[rmid];
+	case QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID:
+		return &d->mbm_local[rmid];
+	default:
+		return NULL;
+	}
+}
+
 static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
 {
 	struct mbm_state *m;
 	u64 tval = 0;
 
-	if (rr->first)
+	if (rr->first) {
 		resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(rr->r, rr->d, rmid, rr->evtid);
+		m = get_mbm_state(rr->d, rmid, rr->evtid);
+		if (m)
+			memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
+		return 0;
+	}
 
 	rr->err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(rr->r, rr->d, rmid, rr->evtid, &tval);
 	if (rr->err)
 		return rr->err;
 
-	switch (rr->evtid) {
-	case QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID:
-		rr->val += tval;
-		return 0;
-	case QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID:
-		m = &rr->d->mbm_total[rmid];
-		break;
-	case QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID:
-		m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
-		break;
-	default:
-		/*
-		 * Code would never reach here because an invalid
-		 * event id would fail in resctrl_arch_rmid_read().
-		 */
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	if (rr->first) {
-		memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	rr->val += tval;
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-20 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20 16:41 [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/resctrl: Fix event counts regression in reused RMIDs Peter Newman
2022-12-20 16:41 ` Peter Newman [this message]
2023-01-10 16:01   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/resctrl: Avoid redundant counter read in __mon_event_count() Moger, Babu
2023-01-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/resctrl: Fix event counts regression in reused RMIDs Moger, Babu
2023-01-10 19:04 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Newman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221220164132.443083-2-peternewman@google.com \
    --to=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®