mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	reinette.chatre@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, james.morse@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, quic_jiles@quicinc.com,
	tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/resctrl: Avoid redundant counter read in __mon_event_count()
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:01:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <364c2d8d-dc81-9ccc-51e8-92cd8db3c4ee@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221220164132.443083-2-peternewman@google.com>


On 12/20/22 10:41, Peter Newman wrote:
> __mon_event_count() does the per-RMID, per-domain work for
> user-initiated event count reads and the initialization of new monitor
> groups.
>
> In the initialization case, after resctrl_arch_reset_rmid() calls
> __rmid_read() to record an initial count for a new monitor group, it
> immediately calls resctrl_arch_rmid_read(). This re-read of the hardware
> counter is unnecessary and the following computations are ignored by the
> caller during initialization.
>
> Following return from resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(), just clear the
> mbm_state and return. This involves moving the mbm_state lookup into the
> rr->first case, as it's not needed for regular event count reads: the
> QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID case was redundant with the accumulating logic at
> the end of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> ---
> v3:
>  - changelog clarifications suggested by Reinette
> v2:
>  (patch introduced)
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221214160856.2164207-2-peternewman@google.com/
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 43 ++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 77538abeb72a..e708df478077 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -366,41 +366,36 @@ void free_rmid(u32 rmid)
>  		list_add_tail(&entry->list, &rmid_free_lru);
>  }
>  
> +static struct mbm_state *get_mbm_state(struct rdt_domain *d, u32 rmid,
> +				       enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
> +{
> +	switch (evtid) {
> +	case QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID:
> +		return &d->mbm_total[rmid];
> +	case QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID:
> +		return &d->mbm_local[rmid];
> +	default:
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
>  {
>  	struct mbm_state *m;
>  	u64 tval = 0;
>  
> -	if (rr->first)
> +	if (rr->first) {
>  		resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(rr->r, rr->d, rmid, rr->evtid);
> +		m = get_mbm_state(rr->d, rmid, rr->evtid);
> +		if (m)
> +			memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	rr->err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(rr->r, rr->d, rmid, rr->evtid, &tval);
>  	if (rr->err)
>  		return rr->err;
>  
> -	switch (rr->evtid) {
> -	case QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID:
> -		rr->val += tval;
> -		return 0;
> -	case QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID:
> -		m = &rr->d->mbm_total[rmid];
> -		break;
> -	case QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID:
> -		m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		/*
> -		 * Code would never reach here because an invalid
> -		 * event id would fail in resctrl_arch_rmid_read().
> -		 */
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (rr->first) {
> -		memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	rr->val += tval;
>  
>  	return 0;

Tested the patches on AMD systems. Looks good.
Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>

Thanks
Babu Moger


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-10 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20 16:41 [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/resctrl: Fix event counts regression in reused RMIDs Peter Newman
2022-12-20 16:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/resctrl: Avoid redundant counter read in __mon_event_count() Peter Newman
2023-01-10 16:01   ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2023-01-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/resctrl: Fix event counts regression in reused RMIDs Moger, Babu
2023-01-10 19:04 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Newman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=364c2d8d-dc81-9ccc-51e8-92cd8db3c4ee@amd.com \
    --to=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®