From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: remove GCC from CX power domain
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:16:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221230171619.om5mfvsp7gwatvu6@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221230155502.115205-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 04:55:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Bindings do not allow power-domain property in GCC clock controller and
> documentation does not indicate that GCC is part of VDD_CX.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Maybe the bindings should be fixed? Maybe this was added as workaround?
> Anyway looking at documentation I do not see such relation, except
> downstream vdd_cx-supply (which is the same as in other SoCs and we do
> not represent it in upstream).
The GCC itself is powered by CX and the GDSC power-domains exposed by
GCC are powered by CX.
It's fairly recently that we started attempting to scale CX - and
attempted to suspend things. But this is probably how it should be
represented on all platforms.
So let's fix the binding instead.
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> index 1d1420c8720c..d14663c9f34c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> @@ -799,7 +799,6 @@ gcc: clock-controller@100000 {
> <&pcie4_phy>,
> <0>,
> <0>;
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>;
> };
>
> ipcc: mailbox@408000 {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-30 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-30 15:55 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-30 17:16 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2023-01-02 8:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221230171619.om5mfvsp7gwatvu6@builder.lan \
--to=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®