[PATCH] kvm: x86/mmu: Rename SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK to SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED

[PATCH] kvm: x86/mmu: Rename SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK to SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED

[Lai Jiangshan]

From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>

SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK, SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED_MASK and
SPTE_TDP_AD_WRPROT_ONLY_MASK are actual value, not mask.

Remove "MASK" from their names.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c |  6 +++---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index fce6f047399f..c15bfca3ed15 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -147,9 +147,9 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_access && !shadow_present_mask);
 
 	if (sp->role.ad_disabled)
-		spte |= SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED_MASK;
+		spte |= SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED;
 	else if (kvm_mmu_page_ad_need_write_protect(sp))
-		spte |= SPTE_TDP_AD_WRPROT_ONLY_MASK;
+		spte |= SPTE_TDP_AD_WRPROT_ONLY;
 
 	/*
 	 * For the EPT case, shadow_present_mask is 0 if hardware
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ u64 make_nonleaf_spte(u64 *child_pt, bool ad_disabled)
 		shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask | shadow_me_value;
 
 	if (ad_disabled)
-		spte |= SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED_MASK;
+		spte |= SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED;
 	else
 		spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index 0d8deefee66c..1279db2eab44 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -28,10 +28,10 @@
  */
 #define SPTE_TDP_AD_SHIFT		52
 #define SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK		(3ULL << SPTE_TDP_AD_SHIFT)
-#define SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK	(0ULL << SPTE_TDP_AD_SHIFT)
-#define SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED_MASK	(1ULL << SPTE_TDP_AD_SHIFT)
-#define SPTE_TDP_AD_WRPROT_ONLY_MASK	(2ULL << SPTE_TDP_AD_SHIFT)
-static_assert(SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK == 0);
+#define SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED		(0ULL << SPTE_TDP_AD_SHIFT)
+#define SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED		(1ULL << SPTE_TDP_AD_SHIFT)
+#define SPTE_TDP_AD_WRPROT_ONLY		(2ULL << SPTE_TDP_AD_SHIFT)
+static_assert(SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED == 0);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK
 #define SPTE_BASE_ADDR_MASK (physical_mask & ~(u64)(PAGE_SIZE-1))
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_value;
 extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_mask;
 
 /*
- * SPTEs in MMUs without A/D bits are marked with SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED_MASK;
+ * SPTEs in MMUs without A/D bits are marked with SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED;
  * shadow_acc_track_mask is the set of bits to be cleared in non-accessed
  * pages.
  */
@@ -266,18 +266,18 @@ static inline bool sp_ad_disabled(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 static inline bool spte_ad_enabled(u64 spte)
 {
 	MMU_WARN_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(spte));
-	return (spte & SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK) != SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED_MASK;
+	return (spte & SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK) != SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED;
 }
 
 static inline bool spte_ad_need_write_protect(u64 spte)
 {
 	MMU_WARN_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(spte));
 	/*
-	 * This is benign for non-TDP SPTEs as SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK is '0',
+	 * This is benign for non-TDP SPTEs as SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED is '0',
 	 * and non-TDP SPTEs will never set these bits.  Optimize for 64-bit
 	 * TDP and do the A/D type check unconditionally.
 	 */
-	return (spte & SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK) != SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK;
+	return (spte & SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK) != SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED;
 }
 
 static inline u64 spte_shadow_accessed_mask(u64 spte)
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b

Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86/mmu: Rename SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK to SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED

[Sean Christopherson]

On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 18:02:03 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK, SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED_MASK and
> SPTE_TDP_AD_WRPROT_ONLY_MASK are actual value, not mask.
> 
> Remove "MASK" from their names.
> 
> 

Applied to kvm-x86 mmu, thanks!

[1/1] kvm: x86/mmu: Rename SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK to SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED
      https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/6458637fa09a

--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/fixes