mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	gscrivan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cgroup/cpuset: Allow only one active attach operation per cpuset
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:44:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406-haselnuss-baumhaus-83dc05f869df@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230331145045.2251683-4-longman@redhat.com>

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:50:45AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> The current cpuset code uses the global cpuset_attach_old_cs variable
> to store the old cpuset value between consecutive cpuset_can_attach()
> and cpuset_attach() calls. Since a caller of cpuset_can_attach() may
> not need to hold the global cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem, parallel cpuset
> attach operations are possible.
> 
> When there are concurrent cpuset attach operations in progress,
> cpuset_attach() may fetch the wrong value from cpuset_attach_old_cs
> causing incorrect result.  To avoid this problem while still allowing
> certain level of parallelism, drop cpuset_attach_old_cs and use a
> per-cpuset attach_old_cs value. Also restrict to at most one active
> attach operation per cpuset to avoid corrupting the value of the
> per-cpuset attach_old_cs value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 2367de611c42..3f925c261513 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -198,6 +198,8 @@ struct cpuset {
>  
>  	/* Handle for cpuset.cpus.partition */
>  	struct cgroup_file partition_file;
> +
> +	struct cpuset *attach_old_cs;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2456,22 +2458,27 @@ static int fmeter_getrate(struct fmeter *fmp)
>  	return val;
>  }
>  
> -static struct cpuset *cpuset_attach_old_cs;
> -
>  /* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cpuset_rwsem held */
>  static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
>  {
>  	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> -	struct cpuset *cs;
> +	struct cpuset *cs, *oldcs;
>  	struct task_struct *task;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* used later by cpuset_attach() */
> -	cpuset_attach_old_cs = task_cs(cgroup_taskset_first(tset, &css));
> +	oldcs = task_cs(cgroup_taskset_first(tset, &css));
>  	cs = css_cs(css);
>  
>  	percpu_down_write(&cpuset_rwsem);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Only one cpuset attach operation is allowed for each cpuset.
> +	 */
> +	ret = -EBUSY;
> +	if (cs->attach_in_progress)
> +		goto out_unlock;

That'll mean CLONE_INTO_CGROUP becomes even more interestig because it
isn't subject to this restriction in contrast to fork()+migrate, right?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-06  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-31 14:50 [PATCH 0/3] cgroup/cpuset: Fix CLONE_INTO_CGROUP problem & other issues Waiman Long
2023-03-31 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] cgroup/cpuset: Make cpuset_fork() handle CLONE_INTO_CGROUP properly Waiman Long
2023-04-03 16:55   ` Michal Koutný
2023-04-03 17:18     ` Waiman Long
2023-04-03 17:29       ` Waiman Long
2023-04-04  9:19       ` Michal Koutný
2023-04-04 13:52         ` Waiman Long
2023-04-04 17:26           ` Waiman Long
2023-04-06  2:51   ` kernel test robot
2023-04-06 12:17     ` Waiman Long
2023-04-06  9:45   ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-06 14:08     ` Waiman Long
2023-03-31 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] cgroup/cpuset: Make cpuset_attach_task() skip subpartitions CPUs for top_cpuset Waiman Long
2023-04-03 16:35   ` Michal Koutný
2023-03-31 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] cgroup/cpuset: Allow only one active attach operation per cpuset Waiman Long
2023-04-03 16:47   ` Michal Koutný
2023-04-03 17:41     ` Waiman Long
2023-04-04  9:07       ` Michal Koutný
2023-04-04 14:12         ` Waiman Long
2023-04-06  9:44   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-04-07 15:30     ` Waiman Long
2023-04-09 11:46       ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230406-haselnuss-baumhaus-83dc05f869df@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gscrivan@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®