* [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
@ 2023-04-12 20:26 Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code Josh Poimboeuf
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-12 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Miroslav Benes
Josh Poimboeuf (3):
objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code
x86/linkage: Fix padding for typed functions
objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h | 2 +-
tools/objtool/check.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code
2023-04-12 20:26 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2023-04-12 20:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-14 14:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/linkage: Fix padding for typed functions Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
2 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-12 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Miroslav Benes
Simplify the prefix code and make it a standalone feature.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 53940e2ac632..2f3136145b2e 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -4120,54 +4120,61 @@ static bool ignore_unreachable_insn(struct objtool_file *file, struct instructio
return false;
}
-static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
- struct instruction *insn)
+static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
{
- if (!opts.prefix)
- return 0;
+ struct instruction *insn, *prev;
- for (;;) {
- struct instruction *prev = prev_insn_same_sec(file, insn);
- u64 offset;
+ insn = find_insn(file, func->sec, func->offset);
+ if (!insn)
+ return -1;
- if (!prev)
- break;
+ for (prev = prev_insn_same_sec(file, insn);
+ prev;
+ prev = prev_insn_same_sec(file, prev)) {
+ u64 offset;
if (prev->type != INSN_NOP)
- break;
+ return -1;
offset = func->offset - prev->offset;
- if (offset >= opts.prefix) {
- if (offset == opts.prefix) {
- /*
- * Since the sec->symbol_list is ordered by
- * offset (see elf_add_symbol()) the added
- * symbol will not be seen by the iteration in
- * validate_section().
- *
- * Hence the lack of list_for_each_entry_safe()
- * there.
- *
- * The direct concequence is that prefix symbols
- * don't get visited (because pointless), except
- * for the logic in ignore_unreachable_insn()
- * that needs the terminating insn to be visited
- * otherwise it will report the hole.
- *
- * Hence mark the first instruction of the
- * prefix symbol as visisted.
- */
- prev->visited |= VISITED_BRANCH;
- elf_create_prefix_symbol(file->elf, func, opts.prefix);
- }
- break;
- }
- insn = prev;
+
+ if (offset > opts.prefix)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (offset < opts.prefix)
+ continue;
+
+ elf_create_prefix_symbol(file->elf, func, opts.prefix);
+ break;
}
+ if (!prev)
+ return -1;
+
return 0;
}
+static int add_prefix_symbols(struct objtool_file *file)
+{
+ struct section *sec;
+ struct symbol *func;
+ int ret, warnings = 0;
+
+ for_each_sec(file, sec) {
+ if (!(sec->sh.sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR))
+ continue;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(func, &sec->symbol_list, list) {
+ if (func->type != STT_FUNC)
+ continue;
+
+ add_prefix_symbol(file, func);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return warnings;
+}
+
static int validate_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct section *sec,
struct symbol *sym, struct insn_state *state)
{
@@ -4186,8 +4193,6 @@ static int validate_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct section *sec,
if (!insn || insn->ignore || insn->visited)
return 0;
- add_prefix_symbol(file, sym, insn);
-
state->uaccess = sym->uaccess_safe;
ret = validate_branch(file, insn_func(insn), insn, *state);
@@ -4744,6 +4749,13 @@ int check(struct objtool_file *file)
warnings += ret;
}
+ if (opts.prefix) {
+ ret = add_prefix_symbols(file);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ warnings += ret;
+ }
+
if (opts.ibt) {
ret = create_ibt_endbr_seal_sections(file);
if (ret < 0)
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] x86/linkage: Fix padding for typed functions
2023-04-12 20:26 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2023-04-12 20:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-14 14:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-12 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Miroslav Benes
CFI typed functions are failing to get padded properly for
CONFIG_CALL_PADDING.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h
index dd9b8118f784..0953aa32a324 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
/* SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START -- use for indirectly called globals, w/ CFI type */
#define SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(name) \
- SYM_TYPED_START(name, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_ALIGN) \
+ SYM_TYPED_START(name, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_F_ALIGN) \
ENDBR
/* SYM_FUNC_START -- use for global functions */
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
2023-04-12 20:26 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/linkage: Fix padding for typed functions Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2023-04-12 20:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
` (2 more replies)
2 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-12 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Miroslav Benes
Allow unwinding from prefix code by copying the CFI from the starting
instruction of the corresponding function. Even when the NOPs are
replaced, they're still stack-invariant instructions so the same ORC
entry can be reused everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 2f3136145b2e..3f27a0278bf8 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -4123,6 +4123,7 @@ static bool ignore_unreachable_insn(struct objtool_file *file, struct instructio
static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
{
struct instruction *insn, *prev;
+ struct cfi_state *cfi;
insn = find_insn(file, func->sec, func->offset);
if (!insn)
@@ -4151,6 +4152,19 @@ static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
if (!prev)
return -1;
+ if (!insn->cfi) {
+ /*
+ * This can happen if stack validation isn't enabled or the
+ * function is annotated with STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD.
+ */
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Propagate insn->cfi to the prefix code */
+ cfi = cfi_hash_find_or_add(insn->cfi);
+ for (; prev != insn; prev = next_insn_same_sec(file, prev))
+ prev->cfi = cfi;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -4158,7 +4172,7 @@ static int add_prefix_symbols(struct objtool_file *file)
{
struct section *sec;
struct symbol *func;
- int ret, warnings = 0;
+ int warnings = 0;
for_each_sec(file, sec) {
if (!(sec->sh.sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR))
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2023-04-13 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 15:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-14 14:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-04-13 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Poimboeuf; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Miroslav Benes
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:26:13PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Simplify the prefix code and make it a standalone feature.
The main thing being that you moved it all after
validate_reachable_instructions() ?
> +static int add_prefix_symbols(struct objtool_file *file)
> +{
> + struct section *sec;
> + struct symbol *func;
> + int ret, warnings = 0;
> +
> + for_each_sec(file, sec) {
> + if (!(sec->sh.sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR))
> + continue;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(func, &sec->symbol_list, list) {
One of the other patches did a sec_for_each_symbol() thing.
> + if (func->type != STT_FUNC)
> + continue;
> +
> + add_prefix_symbol(file, func);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return warnings;
> +}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2023-04-13 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-14 14:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-04-13 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Poimboeuf; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Miroslav Benes
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:26:15PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> @@ -4158,7 +4172,7 @@ static int add_prefix_symbols(struct objtool_file *file)
> {
> struct section *sec;
> struct symbol *func;
> - int ret, warnings = 0;
> + int warnings = 0;
>
> for_each_sec(file, sec) {
> if (!(sec->sh.sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR))
Stray hunk that should go in the first patch I suppose.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-04-13 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 15:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-14 14:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-04-13 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Poimboeuf; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Miroslav Benes
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:26:15PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Allow unwinding from prefix code by copying the CFI from the starting
> instruction of the corresponding function. Even when the NOPs are
> replaced, they're still stack-invariant instructions so the same ORC
> entry can be reused everywhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/objtool/check.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
> index 2f3136145b2e..3f27a0278bf8 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> @@ -4123,6 +4123,7 @@ static bool ignore_unreachable_insn(struct objtool_file *file, struct instructio
> static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
> {
> struct instruction *insn, *prev;
> + struct cfi_state *cfi;
>
> insn = find_insn(file, func->sec, func->offset);
> if (!insn)
> @@ -4151,6 +4152,19 @@ static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
> if (!prev)
> return -1;
>
> + if (!insn->cfi) {
> + /*
> + * This can happen if stack validation isn't enabled or the
> + * function is annotated with STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD.
> + */
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Propagate insn->cfi to the prefix code */
> + cfi = cfi_hash_find_or_add(insn->cfi);
> + for (; prev != insn; prev = next_insn_same_sec(file, prev))
> + prev->cfi = cfi;
> +
> return 0;
> }
FWIW, this makes the whole thing hard rely on the prefix being single
byte NOPs -- which they are, but perhaps we should assert this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code
2023-04-13 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-04-13 15:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-13 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Miroslav Benes
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:30:31AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:26:13PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Simplify the prefix code and make it a standalone feature.
>
> The main thing being that you moved it all after
> validate_reachable_instructions() ?
The main thing being that I extricated it from validate_symbol() so it's
a proper independent feature.
> > +static int add_prefix_symbols(struct objtool_file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct section *sec;
> > + struct symbol *func;
> > + int ret, warnings = 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_sec(file, sec) {
> > + if (!(sec->sh.sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(func, &sec->symbol_list, list) {
>
> One of the other patches did a sec_for_each_symbol() thing.
Too many patch sets floating around ;-)
--
Josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
2023-04-13 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-04-13 15:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-13 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Miroslav Benes
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 01:24:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > + if (!insn->cfi) {
> > + /*
> > + * This can happen if stack validation isn't enabled or the
> > + * function is annotated with STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD.
> > + */
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Propagate insn->cfi to the prefix code */
> > + cfi = cfi_hash_find_or_add(insn->cfi);
> > + for (; prev != insn; prev = next_insn_same_sec(file, prev))
> > + prev->cfi = cfi;
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> FWIW, this makes the whole thing hard rely on the prefix being single
> byte NOPs -- which they are, but perhaps we should assert this?
Couldn't they be any stack-invariant instructions?
--
Josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
2023-04-13 15:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2023-04-13 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 19:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-04-13 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Poimboeuf; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Miroslav Benes
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 08:29:33AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 01:24:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > + if (!insn->cfi) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * This can happen if stack validation isn't enabled or the
> > > + * function is annotated with STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD.
> > > + */
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Propagate insn->cfi to the prefix code */
> > > + cfi = cfi_hash_find_or_add(insn->cfi);
> > > + for (; prev != insn; prev = next_insn_same_sec(file, prev))
> > > + prev->cfi = cfi;
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> >
> > FWIW, this makes the whole thing hard rely on the prefix being single
> > byte NOPs -- which they are, but perhaps we should assert this?
>
> Couldn't they be any stack-invariant instructions?
Hmm, I was thikning that since we don't know the size of the
instructions being written, we need CFI for all offsets. But perhaps,
since we do a left-match on IP, only one entry at the __pfx+0 location
would work?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
2023-04-13 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-04-13 19:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-13 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Miroslav Benes
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 09:24:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 08:29:33AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 01:24:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > + if (!insn->cfi) {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * This can happen if stack validation isn't enabled or the
> > > > + * function is annotated with STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD.
> > > > + */
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Propagate insn->cfi to the prefix code */
> > > > + cfi = cfi_hash_find_or_add(insn->cfi);
> > > > + for (; prev != insn; prev = next_insn_same_sec(file, prev))
> > > > + prev->cfi = cfi;
> > > > +
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > FWIW, this makes the whole thing hard rely on the prefix being single
> > > byte NOPs -- which they are, but perhaps we should assert this?
> >
> > Couldn't they be any stack-invariant instructions?
>
> Hmm, I was thikning that since we don't know the size of the
> instructions being written, we need CFI for all offsets. But perhaps,
> since we do a left-match on IP, only one entry at the __pfx+0 location
> would work?
Right, while in objtool (almost) every insn has insn->cfi, the actual
ORC entries only get created at the boundaries of change.
--
Josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [tip: objtool/core] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-04-14 14:47 ` tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-14 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), x86, linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the objtool/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5743654f5e2ebd56df99f56fca5ba4b23fe3c815
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5743654f5e2ebd56df99f56fca5ba4b23fe3c815
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:26:15 -07:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:08:30 +02:00
objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code
Allow unwinding from prefix code by copying the CFI from the starting
instruction of the corresponding function. Even when the NOPs are
replaced, they're still stack-invariant instructions so the same ORC
entry can be reused everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/bc3344e51f3e87102f1301a0be0f72a7689ea4a4.1681331135.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 8ee4d51..df634da 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -4117,6 +4117,7 @@ static bool ignore_unreachable_insn(struct objtool_file *file, struct instructio
static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
{
struct instruction *insn, *prev;
+ struct cfi_state *cfi;
insn = find_insn(file, func->sec, func->offset);
if (!insn)
@@ -4145,6 +4146,19 @@ static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
if (!prev)
return -1;
+ if (!insn->cfi) {
+ /*
+ * This can happen if stack validation isn't enabled or the
+ * function is annotated with STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD.
+ */
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Propagate insn->cfi to the prefix code */
+ cfi = cfi_hash_find_or_add(insn->cfi);
+ for (; prev != insn; prev = next_insn_same_sec(file, prev))
+ prev->cfi = cfi;
+
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [tip: objtool/core] x86/linkage: Fix padding for typed functions
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/linkage: Fix padding for typed functions Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2023-04-14 14:47 ` tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-14 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), x86, linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the objtool/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 4a2c3448ed3d362431c249ec0eb0f90281804ea8
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4a2c3448ed3d362431c249ec0eb0f90281804ea8
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:26:14 -07:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:08:30 +02:00
x86/linkage: Fix padding for typed functions
CFI typed functions are failing to get padded properly for
CONFIG_CALL_PADDING.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/721f0da48d2a49fe907225711b8b76a2b787f9a8.1681331135.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h
index dd9b811..0953aa3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
/* SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START -- use for indirectly called globals, w/ CFI type */
#define SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(name) \
- SYM_TYPED_START(name, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_ALIGN) \
+ SYM_TYPED_START(name, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_F_ALIGN) \
ENDBR
/* SYM_FUNC_START -- use for global functions */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [tip: objtool/core] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-04-14 14:47 ` tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf @ 2023-04-14 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), x86, linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the objtool/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: bd456a1bedd20cebd37493f8cb0291294a7356ea
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/bd456a1bedd20cebd37493f8cb0291294a7356ea
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:26:13 -07:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:08:29 +02:00
objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code
Simplify the prefix code by moving it after
validate_reachable_instructions().
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/d7f31ac2de462d0cd7b1db01b7ecb525c057c8f6.1681331135.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 1cf2e28..8ee4d51 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -4114,54 +4114,61 @@ static bool ignore_unreachable_insn(struct objtool_file *file, struct instructio
return false;
}
-static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
- struct instruction *insn)
+static int add_prefix_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
{
- if (!opts.prefix)
- return 0;
+ struct instruction *insn, *prev;
- for (;;) {
- struct instruction *prev = prev_insn_same_sec(file, insn);
- u64 offset;
+ insn = find_insn(file, func->sec, func->offset);
+ if (!insn)
+ return -1;
- if (!prev)
- break;
+ for (prev = prev_insn_same_sec(file, insn);
+ prev;
+ prev = prev_insn_same_sec(file, prev)) {
+ u64 offset;
if (prev->type != INSN_NOP)
- break;
+ return -1;
offset = func->offset - prev->offset;
- if (offset >= opts.prefix) {
- if (offset == opts.prefix) {
- /*
- * Since the sec->symbol_list is ordered by
- * offset (see elf_add_symbol()) the added
- * symbol will not be seen by the iteration in
- * validate_section().
- *
- * Hence the lack of list_for_each_entry_safe()
- * there.
- *
- * The direct concequence is that prefix symbols
- * don't get visited (because pointless), except
- * for the logic in ignore_unreachable_insn()
- * that needs the terminating insn to be visited
- * otherwise it will report the hole.
- *
- * Hence mark the first instruction of the
- * prefix symbol as visisted.
- */
- prev->visited |= VISITED_BRANCH;
- elf_create_prefix_symbol(file->elf, func, opts.prefix);
- }
- break;
- }
- insn = prev;
+
+ if (offset > opts.prefix)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (offset < opts.prefix)
+ continue;
+
+ elf_create_prefix_symbol(file->elf, func, opts.prefix);
+ break;
}
+ if (!prev)
+ return -1;
+
return 0;
}
+static int add_prefix_symbols(struct objtool_file *file)
+{
+ struct section *sec;
+ struct symbol *func;
+ int warnings = 0;
+
+ for_each_sec(file, sec) {
+ if (!(sec->sh.sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR))
+ continue;
+
+ sec_for_each_sym(sec, func) {
+ if (func->type != STT_FUNC)
+ continue;
+
+ add_prefix_symbol(file, func);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return warnings;
+}
+
static int validate_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct section *sec,
struct symbol *sym, struct insn_state *state)
{
@@ -4180,8 +4187,6 @@ static int validate_symbol(struct objtool_file *file, struct section *sec,
if (!insn || insn->ignore || insn->visited)
return 0;
- add_prefix_symbol(file, sym, insn);
-
state->uaccess = sym->uaccess_safe;
ret = validate_branch(file, insn_func(insn), insn, *state);
@@ -4621,6 +4626,13 @@ int check(struct objtool_file *file)
warnings += ret;
}
+ if (opts.prefix) {
+ ret = add_prefix_symbols(file);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ warnings += ret;
+ }
+
if (opts.ibt) {
ret = create_ibt_endbr_seal_sections(file);
if (ret < 0)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-14 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-12 20:26 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Separate prefix code from stack validation code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 15:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-14 14:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/linkage: Fix padding for typed functions Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-14 14:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-12 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Generate ORC data for __pfx code Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 15:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-13 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 19:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-14 14:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®