mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] swiotlb: Fix debugfs reporting of reserved memory pools
@ 2023-04-13 15:37 Michael Kelley
  2023-04-13 18:52 ` Petr Tesařík
  2023-04-16  6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Kelley @ 2023-04-13 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, decui, tiala, petr.tesarik.ext,
	iommu, linux-kernel
  Cc: mikelley

For io_tlb_nslabs, the debugfs code reports the correct value for a
specific reserved memory pool.  But for io_tlb_used, the value reported
is always for the default pool, not the specific reserved pool. Fix this.

Fixes: 5c850d31880e ("swiotlb: fix passing local variable to debugfs_create_ulong()")
Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
---

I don't have a way to test this directly with OF reserved memory, but I
cobbled together a hack to call rmem_swiotlb_device_init() multiple times
for different size reserved pools. I verified that reserved pool debugfs entries
are created as expected and that the value of io_tlb_used is *not* the value
from the default pool.

 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index dac42a2..db43de82 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -930,7 +930,9 @@ bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev)
 
 static int io_tlb_used_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 {
-	*val = mem_used(&io_tlb_default_mem);
+	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = data;
+
+	*val = mem_used(mem);
 	return 0;
 }
 DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_io_tlb_used, io_tlb_used_get, NULL, "%llu\n");
@@ -943,7 +945,7 @@ static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(struct io_tlb_mem *mem,
 		return;
 
 	debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_nslabs", 0400, mem->debugfs, &mem->nslabs);
-	debugfs_create_file("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, NULL,
+	debugfs_create_file("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, mem,
 			&fops_io_tlb_used);
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] swiotlb: Fix debugfs reporting of reserved memory pools
  2023-04-13 15:37 [PATCH 1/1] swiotlb: Fix debugfs reporting of reserved memory pools Michael Kelley
@ 2023-04-13 18:52 ` Petr Tesařík
  2023-04-16  6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petr Tesařík @ 2023-04-13 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Kelley
  Cc: hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, decui, tiala, petr.tesarik.ext,
	iommu, linux-kernel

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:37:30 -0700
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> wrote:

> For io_tlb_nslabs, the debugfs code reports the correct value for a
> specific reserved memory pool.  But for io_tlb_used, the value reported
> is always for the default pool, not the specific reserved pool. Fix this.
> 
> Fixes: 5c850d31880e ("swiotlb: fix passing local variable to debugfs_create_ulong()")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
> ---
> 
> I don't have a way to test this directly with OF reserved memory, but I
> cobbled together a hack to call rmem_swiotlb_device_init() multiple times
> for different size reserved pools. I verified that reserved pool debugfs entries
> are created as expected and that the value of io_tlb_used is *not* the value
> from the default pool.

Yeah, the only in-tree user is Mediatek Asurada, and I don't have one
either...

The patch looks good to me. But you know, I'm now well-known for
breaking things because of insufficient testing. ;-)

Petr T

>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index dac42a2..db43de82 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -930,7 +930,9 @@ bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev)
>  
>  static int io_tlb_used_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>  {
> -	*val = mem_used(&io_tlb_default_mem);
> +	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = data;
> +
> +	*val = mem_used(mem);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_io_tlb_used, io_tlb_used_get, NULL,
> "%llu\n"); @@ -943,7 +945,7 @@ static void
> swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, return;
>  
>  	debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_nslabs", 0400, mem->debugfs,
> &mem->nslabs);
> -	debugfs_create_file("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, NULL,
> +	debugfs_create_file("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, mem,
>  			&fops_io_tlb_used);
>  }
>  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] swiotlb: Fix debugfs reporting of reserved memory pools
  2023-04-13 15:37 [PATCH 1/1] swiotlb: Fix debugfs reporting of reserved memory pools Michael Kelley
  2023-04-13 18:52 ` Petr Tesařík
@ 2023-04-16  6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2023-04-16  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Kelley
  Cc: hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, decui, tiala, petr.tesarik.ext,
	iommu, linux-kernel

Thanks,

applied to the dma-mapping for-next tree.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-16  6:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-13 15:37 [PATCH 1/1] swiotlb: Fix debugfs reporting of reserved memory pools Michael Kelley
2023-04-13 18:52 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-04-16  6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®