mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: r8169: disable ASPM during NAPI poll locking changes --> BUG: Invalid wait context --> PREEMPT_RT pain
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 15:43:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522134315.oBK0Ll7f@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7fa9ffe0e6cd546b8ff3826379c2cf78e5342b6.camel@gmx.de>

On 2023-05-22 12:41:21 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > I've been looking at the r8169 the other day and it seemed all good
> > since it was only scheduling workqueues and NAPI. But now I see this
> > mac_ocp_lock + config25_lock which are acquire in hardirq context but
> > can't. This needs to be taken care.
> 
> I did a patch converting the locks, but didn't post it hoping maybe
> those locks weren't really really needed.  It doesn't matter for my
> box, as it doesn't do anything but give RT chances to trip over bugs.

I missed that part. Do you still see those 160us if you keep the locks
as-it as drop the no-threads flag? I'm trying to figure out if this is
due to hwirq context or just blocked PCI-bus due ASPM.

> 	-Mike

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-22 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-21  6:03 Mike Galbraith
2023-05-21 14:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2023-05-22  8:06   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-22 10:32     ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-05-22 10:34       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-22 10:41     ` Mike Galbraith
2023-05-22 13:43       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2023-05-22 17:02         ` Mike Galbraith
2023-05-22 17:12           ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230522134315.oBK0Ll7f@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®