From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: r8169: disable ASPM during NAPI poll locking changes --> BUG: Invalid wait context --> PREEMPT_RT pain
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 12:32:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59e86f97-3e77-14e0-948a-1a87ccf72f36@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230522080604.MgUGcyeU@linutronix.de>
On 22.05.2023 10:06, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2023-05-21 16:27:10 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> On Sun, 2023-05-21 at 08:03 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> The locks added to prep for $subject induce invalid context moaning due
>>> to not being raw locks, but if I do that, the hold time does very bad
>>> things to RT.
>>
>> The locks aren't really 160us horrible. The GPU was enabled (oops),
>> nouveau then makes box horrible for RT (and graphics:). With GPU
>> turned back off, the largest trace I saw was 77us, which jibes pretty
>> well with new max of low to mid 50s without ftrace running, or up a tad
>> over 20us for this now pretty old commodity i7 desktop box.
>
> So you are saying it is all good?
> I've been looking at the r8169 the other day and it seemed all good
> since it was only scheduling workqueues and NAPI. But now I see this
> mac_ocp_lock + config25_lock which are acquire in hardirq context but
> can't. This needs to be taken care.
What do you mean with "but can't"? Taking a spinlock in hardirq context
is normal.
>
>> -Mike
>
> Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-22 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-21 6:03 Mike Galbraith
2023-05-21 14:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2023-05-22 8:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-22 10:32 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2023-05-22 10:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-22 10:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2023-05-22 13:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-22 17:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2023-05-22 17:12 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59e86f97-3e77-14e0-948a-1a87ccf72f36@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®