mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
	Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com, "Connor O'Brien" <connoro@google.com>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/13] locking/ww_mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock
Date: Thu,  1 Jun 2023 05:58:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230601055846.2349566-3-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601055846.2349566-1-jstultz@google.com>

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

In preparation to nest mutex::wait_lock under rq::lock we need to remove
wakeups from under it.

Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
v2:
* Move wake_q_init() as suggested by Waiman Long
---
 include/linux/ww_mutex.h  |  3 +++
 kernel/locking/mutex.c    |  8 ++++++++
 kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 10 ++++++++--
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index bb763085479a..9335b2202017 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
+#include <linux/sched/wake_q.h>
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES) || \
    (defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES))
@@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ struct ww_acquire_ctx {
 	unsigned int acquired;
 	unsigned short wounded;
 	unsigned short is_wait_die;
+	struct wake_q_head wake_q;
 #ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
 	unsigned int done_acquire;
 	struct ww_class *ww_class;
@@ -137,6 +139,7 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
 	ctx->acquired = 0;
 	ctx->wounded = false;
 	ctx->is_wait_die = ww_class->is_wait_die;
+	wake_q_init(&ctx->wake_q);
 #ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
 	ctx->ww_class = ww_class;
 	ctx->done_acquire = 0;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index d973fe6041bf..1582756914df 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -676,6 +676,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 		}
 
 		raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+		if (ww_ctx)
+			ww_ctx_wake(ww_ctx);
 		schedule_preempt_disabled();
 
 		first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter);
@@ -725,6 +727,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 		ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
 
 	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+	if (ww_ctx)
+		ww_ctx_wake(ww_ctx);
 	preempt_enable();
 	return 0;
 
@@ -736,6 +740,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 	debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
 	mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
+	if (ww_ctx)
+		ww_ctx_wake(ww_ctx);
 	preempt_enable();
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -946,9 +952,11 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
 	if (owner & MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF)
 		__mutex_handoff(lock, next);
 
+	preempt_disable();
 	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 
 	wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
index 56f139201f24..e49ea5336473 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
@@ -161,6 +161,12 @@ static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 
 #endif /* WW_RT */
 
+void ww_ctx_wake(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+{
+	wake_up_q(&ww_ctx->wake_q);
+	wake_q_init(&ww_ctx->wake_q);
+}
+
 /*
  * Wait-Die:
  *   The newer transactions are killed when:
@@ -284,7 +290,7 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
 #ifndef WW_RT
 		debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
 #endif
-		wake_up_process(waiter->task);
+		wake_q_add(&ww_ctx->wake_q, waiter->task);
 	}
 
 	return true;
@@ -331,7 +337,7 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock,
 		 * wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state.
 		 */
 		if (owner != current)
-			wake_up_process(owner);
+			wake_q_add(&ww_ctx->wake_q, owner);
 
 		return true;
 	}
-- 
2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01  5:58 [PATCH v4 00/13] Generalized Priority Inheritance via Proxy Execution v3 John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] sched: Unify runtime accounting across classes John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` John Stultz [this message]
2023-06-23 12:21   ` [PATCH v4 02/13] locking/ww_mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock Dietmar Eggemann
2023-06-24  0:41     ` John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] locking/mutex: make mutex::wait_lock irq safe John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] locking/mutex: Add task_struct::blocked_lock to serialize changes to the blocked_on state John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner() John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] sched: Split scheduler execution context John Stultz
2023-06-13 17:12   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-06-13 20:37     ` John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] sched: Unnest ttwu_runnable in prep for proxy-execution John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] sched: Add proxy execution John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] sched/rt: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] sched: Fix runtime accounting w/ proxy-execution John Stultz
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] sched: Attempt to fix rt/dl load balancing via chain level balance John Stultz
2023-06-01 14:18   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-01 14:33   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-01 14:33   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-01  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] sched: Fixups to find_exec_ctx John Stultz
2023-06-12 17:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Generalized Priority Inheritance via Proxy Execution v3 K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-12 18:52   ` John Stultz
2023-06-13  3:11     ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-13 17:36 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-06-13 21:31   ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230601055846.2349566-3-jstultz@google.com \
    --to=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=connoro@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qyousef@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=youssefesmat@google.com \
    --cc=zezeozue@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome