From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com, "Connor O'Brien" <connoro@google.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/13] locking/mutex: make mutex::wait_lock irq safe
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 05:58:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230601055846.2349566-4-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601055846.2349566-1-jstultz@google.com>
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
mutex::wait_lock might be nested under rq->lock.
Make it irq safe then.
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[rebase & fix {un,}lock_wait_lock helpers in ww_mutex.h]
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
v3:
* Re-added this patch after it was dropped in v2 which
caused lockdep warnings to trip.
---
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 22 ++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 1582756914df..a528e7f42caa 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
{
struct mutex_waiter waiter;
struct ww_mutex *ww;
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret;
if (!use_ww_ctx)
@@ -614,7 +615,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
return 0;
}
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
/*
* After waiting to acquire the wait_lock, try again.
*/
@@ -675,7 +676,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
goto err;
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
if (ww_ctx)
ww_ctx_wake(ww_ctx);
schedule_preempt_disabled();
@@ -698,9 +699,9 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_MUTEX);
}
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
}
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
acquired:
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
@@ -726,7 +727,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
if (ww_ctx)
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
if (ww_ctx)
ww_ctx_wake(ww_ctx);
preempt_enable();
@@ -737,7 +738,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
__mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
err_early_kill:
trace_contention_end(lock, ret);
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
if (ww_ctx)
@@ -909,6 +910,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
struct task_struct *next = NULL;
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
unsigned long owner;
+ unsigned long flags;
mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
@@ -935,7 +937,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
}
}
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
debug_mutex_unlock(lock);
if (!list_empty(&lock->wait_list)) {
/* get the first entry from the wait-list: */
@@ -953,7 +955,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
__mutex_handoff(lock, next);
preempt_disable();
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
preempt_enable();
diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
index e49ea5336473..984a4e0bff36 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
@@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ __ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct mutex *lock)
return atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & MUTEX_FLAG_WAITERS;
}
-static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock)
+static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long *flags)
{
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, *flags);
}
-static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock)
+static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long flags)
{
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
}
static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct mutex *lock)
@@ -144,14 +144,14 @@ __ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
return rt_mutex_has_waiters(&lock->rtmutex);
}
-static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned long *flags)
{
- raw_spin_lock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock, *flags);
}
-static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, flags)
{
- raw_spin_unlock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock, flags);
}
static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct rt_mutex *lock)
@@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
static __always_inline void
ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock, ctx);
/*
@@ -410,9 +412,9 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
* Uh oh, we raced in fastpath, check if any of the waiters need to
* die or wound us.
*/
- lock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
+ lock_wait_lock(&lock->base, &flags);
__ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx);
- unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
+ unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base, flags);
}
static __always_inline int
--
2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 5:58 [PATCH v4 00/13] Generalized Priority Inheritance via Proxy Execution v3 John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] sched: Unify runtime accounting across classes John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] locking/ww_mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock John Stultz
2023-06-23 12:21 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-06-24 0:41 ` John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` John Stultz [this message]
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] locking/mutex: Add task_struct::blocked_lock to serialize changes to the blocked_on state John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner() John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] sched: Split scheduler execution context John Stultz
2023-06-13 17:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-06-13 20:37 ` John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] sched: Unnest ttwu_runnable in prep for proxy-execution John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] sched: Add proxy execution John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] sched/rt: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] sched: Fix runtime accounting w/ proxy-execution John Stultz
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] sched: Attempt to fix rt/dl load balancing via chain level balance John Stultz
2023-06-01 14:18 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-01 14:33 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-01 14:33 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-01 5:58 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] sched: Fixups to find_exec_ctx John Stultz
2023-06-12 17:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Generalized Priority Inheritance via Proxy Execution v3 K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-12 18:52 ` John Stultz
2023-06-13 3:11 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-13 17:36 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-06-13 21:31 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230601055846.2349566-4-jstultz@google.com \
--to=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=youssefesmat@google.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome