Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/core: Provide sched_rtmutex() and expose sched work helpers

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>]

On 2023-05-25 17:25:07 [+0200], To Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > if that works out this worry goes away.
> > 
> > If we get PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING usable, something like the below might
> > help out with the validation part...
> 
> Okay. So if I don't collide with workqueue do you buy this or do you
> ask for something else. I'm not sure…
> 
> Regarding PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING: If I boot -rc3 with `quiet' then I
> don't see any complains.
> Otherwise it is printk during boot (caller is holding raw_spinlock_t and
> then printk() calls to serial driver with spinlock_t).
> From time to time ppl send "fixes" for PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING splats so
> I would guess they boot with `quiet' and there isn't much else. So we
> are getting close here I guess.
> 
> Do you want me to test the suggested validation map somewhere? Because
> if it works, it could be queued.

Do you want just the validation map or is there something I'm missing?

Sebastian