mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
	kai.huang@intel.com, robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com,
	yuan.yao@linux.intel.com, Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: x86/mmu: convert kvm_zap_gfn_range() to use shared mmu_lock in TDP MMU
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:56:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230714065631.20869-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230714064656.20147-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>

Convert kvm_zap_gfn_range() from holding mmu_lock for write to holding for
read in TDP MMU and allow zapping of non-leaf SPTEs of level <= 1G.
TLB flushes are executed/requested within tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic() guarded
by RCU lock.

GFN zap can be super slow if mmu_lock is held for write when there are
contentions. In worst cases, huge cpu cycles are spent on yielding GFN by
GFN, i.e. the loop of "check and flush tlb -> drop rcu lock ->
drop mmu_lock -> cpu_relax() -> take mmu_lock -> take rcu lock" are entered
for every GFN.
Contentions can either from concurrent zaps holding mmu_lock for write or
from tdp_mmu_map() holding mmu_lock for read.

After converting to hold mmu_lock for read, there will be less contentions
detected and retaking mmu_lock for read is also faster. There's no need to
flush TLB before dropping mmu_lock when there're contentions as SPTEs have
been zapped atomically and TLBs are flushed/flush requested immediately
within RCU lock.
In order to reduce TLB flush count, non-leaf SPTEs not greater than 1G
level are allowed to be zapped if their ranges are fully covered in the
gfn zap range.

Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     | 14 +++++++----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 7f52bbe013b3..1fa2a0a3fc9b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -6310,15 +6310,19 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
 
 	flush = kvm_rmap_zap_gfn_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
 
+	if (flush)
+		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end - gfn_start);
+
 	if (tdp_mmu_enabled) {
+		write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+		read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
 		for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
-			flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(kvm, i, gfn_start,
-						      gfn_end, true, flush);
+			kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, i, gfn_start, gfn_end);
+		read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+		write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 	}
 
-	if (flush)
-		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end - gfn_start);
-
 	kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm, 0, -1ul);
 
 	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 512163d52194..2ad18275b643 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -888,6 +888,56 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
 	return flush;
 }
 
+static void zap_gfn_range_atomic(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
+				 gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	struct tdp_iter iter;
+
+	end = min(end, tdp_mmu_max_gfn_exclusive());
+
+	lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root, PG_LEVEL_4K, start, end) {
+retry:
+		if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, true))
+			continue;
+
+		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * As also documented in tdp_mmu_zap_root(),
+		 * KVM must be able to zap a 1gb shadow page without
+		 * inducing a stall to allow in-place replacement with a 1gb hugepage.
+		 */
+		if (iter.gfn < start ||
+		    iter.gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level) > end ||
+		    iter.level > KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL)
+			continue;
+
+		/* Note, a successful atomic zap also does a remote TLB flush. */
+		if (tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter))
+			goto retry;
+	}
+
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Zap all SPTEs for the range of gfns, [start, end), for all roots with
+ * shared mmu lock in atomic way.
+ * TLB flushs are performed within the rcu lock.
+ */
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
+
+	for_each_valid_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, as_id, true)
+		zap_gfn_range_atomic(kvm, root, start, end);
+}
+
 void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
index 0a63b1afabd3..90856bd7a2fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 
 bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t start,
 				 gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush);
+void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
 bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
 void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm);
 void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-14  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-14  6:46 [PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: x86/mmu: refine memtype related mmu zap Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:50 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: x86/mmu: helpers to return if KVM honors guest MTRRs Yan Zhao
2023-10-07  7:00   ` Like Xu
2023-10-09 19:52     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-09 21:27       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-09 21:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-10  3:46         ` Yan Zhao
2023-10-11  0:08           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-11  1:47             ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:50 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM honors guest MTRRs helper in kvm_tdp_page_fault() Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:51 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM honors guest MTRRs helper when CR0.CD toggles Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:51 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM honors guest MTRRs helper when update mtrr Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] KVM: x86/mmu: zap KVM TDP when noncoherent DMA assignment starts/stops Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] KVM: x86/mmu: move TDP zaps from guest MTRRs update to CR0.CD toggling Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] KVM: VMX: drop IPAT in memtype when CD=1 for KVM_X86_QUIRK_CD_NW_CLEARED Yan Zhao
2023-08-25 21:43   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-04  7:41     ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: x86: centralize code to get CD=1 memtype when guest MTRRs are honored Yan Zhao
2023-08-25 21:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-04  7:46     ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:54 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: x86/mmu: serialize vCPUs to zap gfn " Yan Zhao
2023-08-25 22:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-04  8:24     ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: x86/mmu: fine-grained gfn zap " Yan Zhao
2023-08-25 23:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-04  8:37     ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: x86/mmu: split a single gfn zap range " Yan Zhao
2023-08-25 23:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-04  8:39     ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  6:56 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2023-08-25 21:34   ` [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: x86/mmu: convert kvm_zap_gfn_range() to use shared mmu_lock in TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2023-09-04  7:31     ` Yan Zhao
2023-09-05 22:31       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-06  0:50         ` Yan Zhao
2023-08-25 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: x86/mmu: refine memtype related mmu zap Sean Christopherson
2023-09-04  8:48   ` Yan Zhao
2023-10-05  1:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-05  2:19   ` Huang, Kai
2023-10-05  2:28     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-06  0:50       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230714065631.20869-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yuan.yao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®