[PATCH V2] cpu/SMT: Fix cpu_smt_possible() comment

[PATCH V2] cpu/SMT: Fix cpu_smt_possible() comment

[Zhang Rui]

Commit e1572f1d08be ("cpu/SMT: create and export cpu_smt_possible()")
introduces cpu_smt_possible() to represent if SMT is theoretically
possible. It returns true when SMT is supported and not forcefully
disabled ('nosmt=force'). But the comment of it says "Returns true if
SMT is not supported of forcefully (irreversibly) disabled", which is
wrong. Fix that comment accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
Changes since V1
 - rephrase the changelog
---
 kernel/cpu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 88a7ede322bd..050dda751fc3 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_smt_allowed(unsigned int cpu)
 	return !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_booted_once_mask);
 }
 
-/* Returns true if SMT is not supported of forcefully (irreversibly) disabled */
+/* Returns true if SMT is supported and not forcefully (irreversibly) disabled */
 bool cpu_smt_possible(void)
 {
 	return cpu_smt_control != CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED &&
-- 
2.34.1

[tip: smp/core] cpu/SMT: Fix cpu_smt_possible() comment

[tip-bot2 for Zhang Rui]

The following commit has been merged into the smp/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     52b38b7ad589c89a8c69272497bed20034f8e322
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/52b38b7ad589c89a8c69272497bed20034f8e322
Author:        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 28 Jul 2023 23:53:13 +08:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:32:44 +02:00

cpu/SMT: Fix cpu_smt_possible() comment

Commit e1572f1d08be ("cpu/SMT: create and export cpu_smt_possible()")
introduces cpu_smt_possible() to represent if SMT is theoretically
possible. It returns true when SMT is supported and not forcefully
disabled ('nosmt=force'). But the comment of it says "Returns true if
SMT is not supported of forcefully (irreversibly) disabled", which is
wrong. Fix that comment accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728155313.44170-1-rui.zhang@intel.com

---
 kernel/cpu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 7e8f1b0..f6811c8 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_smt_allowed(unsigned int cpu)
 	return !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_booted_once_mask);
 }
 
-/* Returns true if SMT is not supported of forcefully (irreversibly) disabled */
+/* Returns true if SMT is supported and not forcefully (irreversibly) disabled */
 bool cpu_smt_possible(void)
 {
 	return cpu_smt_control != CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED &&