mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
	Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
	Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>,
	Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
Subject: [patch V3 40/40] x86/apic/uv: Remove the private leaf 0xb parser
Date: Wed,  2 Aug 2023 12:22:00 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230802101934.981826753@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230802101635.459108805@linutronix.de>

The package shift has been already evaluated by the early CPU init.

Put the mindless copy right next to the original leaf 0xb parser.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h    |    5 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   52 ++++++-------------------------------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -126,6 +126,11 @@ static inline unsigned int topology_get_
 	return x86_topo_system.dom_size[dom];
 }
 
+static inline unsigned int topology_get_domain_shift(enum x86_topology_domains dom)
+{
+	return dom == TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN ? 0 : x86_topo_system.dom_shifts[dom - 1];
+}
+
 extern const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu);
 extern const struct cpumask *cpu_clustergroup_mask(int cpu);
 
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -241,54 +241,20 @@ static void __init uv_tsc_check_sync(voi
 	is_uv(UV3) ? sname.s3.field :		\
 	undef)
 
-/* [Copied from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c:detect_extended_topology()] */
-
-#define SMT_LEVEL			0	/* Leaf 0xb SMT level */
-#define INVALID_TYPE			0	/* Leaf 0xb sub-leaf types */
-#define SMT_TYPE			1
-#define CORE_TYPE			2
-#define LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx)		(((ecx) >> 8) & 0xff)
-#define BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax)	((eax) & 0x1f)
-
-static void set_x2apic_bits(void)
-{
-	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx, sub_index;
-	unsigned int sid_shift;
-
-	cpuid(0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-	if (eax < 0xb) {
-		pr_info("UV: CPU does not have CPUID.11\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	cpuid_count(0xb, SMT_LEVEL, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-	if (ebx == 0 || (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) != SMT_TYPE)) {
-		pr_info("UV: CPUID.11 not implemented\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	sid_shift = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
-	sub_index = 1;
-	do {
-		cpuid_count(0xb, sub_index, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-		if (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) == CORE_TYPE) {
-			sid_shift = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
-			break;
-		}
-		sub_index++;
-	} while (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) != INVALID_TYPE);
-
-	uv_cpuid.apicid_shift	= 0;
-	uv_cpuid.apicid_mask	= (~(-1 << sid_shift));
-	uv_cpuid.socketid_shift = sid_shift;
-}
-
 static void __init early_get_apic_socketid_shift(void)
 {
+	unsigned int sid_shift = topology_get_domain_shift(TOPO_ROOT_DOMAIN);
+
 	if (is_uv2_hub() || is_uv3_hub())
 		uvh_apicid.v = uv_early_read_mmr(UVH_APICID);
 
-	set_x2apic_bits();
+	if (sid_shift) {
+		uv_cpuid.apicid_shift	= 0;
+		uv_cpuid.apicid_mask	= (~(-1 << sid_shift));
+		uv_cpuid.socketid_shift = sid_shift;
+	} else {
+		pr_info("UV: CPU does not have valid CPUID.11\n");
+	}
 
 	pr_info("UV: apicid_shift:%d apicid_mask:0x%x\n", uv_cpuid.apicid_shift, uv_cpuid.apicid_mask);
 	pr_info("UV: socketid_shift:%d pnode_mask:0x%x\n", uv_cpuid.socketid_shift, uv_cpuid.pnode_mask);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-02 10:20 [patch V3 00/40] x86/cpu: Rework the topology evaluation Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:20 ` [patch V3 01/40] cpu/SMT: Make SMT control more robust against enumeration failures Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-04 17:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-04 20:01     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 02/40] x86/apic: Fake primary thread mask for XEN/PV Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-04 18:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-04 20:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 03/40] x86/cpu: Encapsulate topology information in cpuinfo_x86 Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 04/40] x86/cpu: Move phys_proc_id into topology info Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 05/40] x86/cpu: Move cpu_die_id " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-09 14:32   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-09 15:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 06/40] scsi: lpfc: Use topology_core_id() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 07/40] hwmon: (fam15h_power) " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 08/40] x86/cpu: Move cpu_core_id into topology info Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 09/40] x86/cpu: Move cu_id " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 10/40] x86/cpu: Remove pointless evaluation of x86_coreid_bits Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 11/40] x86/cpu: Move logical package and die IDs into topology info Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 12/40] x86/cpu: Move cpu_l[l2]c_id " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 13/40] x86/apic: Use BAD_APICID consistently Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 14/40] x86/apic: Use u32 for APIC IDs in global data Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 15/40] x86/apic: Use u32 for check_apicid_used() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 16/40] x86/apic: Use u32 for cpu_present_to_apicid() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 17/40] x86/apic: Use u32 for phys_pkg_id() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 18/40] x86/apic: Use u32 for [gs]et_apic_id() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 19/40] x86/apic: Use u32 for wakeup_secondary_cpu[_64]() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10  7:58   ` Qiuxu Zhuo
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 20/40] x86/cpu/topology: Cure the abuse of cpuinfo for persisting logical ids Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 21/40] x86/cpu: Provide debug interface Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 22/40] x86/cpu: Provide cpuid_read() et al Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 23/40] x86/cpu: Provide cpu_init/parse_topology() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-04  8:14   ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-04  8:28     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-04  8:34       ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-12  6:41   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-12  8:00     ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-14  6:26       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14  7:11         ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-13 13:30     ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-13 14:36       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14  6:20         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14  6:42           ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 24/40] x86/cpu: Add legacy topology parser Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 25/40] x86/cpu: Use common topology code for Centaur and Zhaoxin Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 26/40] x86/cpu: Move __max_die_per_package to common.c Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 27/40] x86/cpu: Provide a sane leaf 0xb/0x1f parser Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12  8:21   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-12 20:04     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-13 15:04       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14  8:25         ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-14 12:26           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14 14:48             ` Brown, Len
2023-08-14 16:13               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-15 19:30                 ` Brown, Len
2023-08-17  9:09                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-18  5:01                     ` Brown, Len
2023-08-21 10:27                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-30  2:46                         ` Brown, Len
2023-08-30 12:39                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-01  3:09                             ` Brown, Len
2023-09-01  7:45                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14 15:28             ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-14 17:12               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 28/40] x86/cpu: Use common topology code for Intel Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 29/40] x86/cpu/amd: Provide a separate accessor for Node ID Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 30/40] x86/cpu: Provide an AMD/HYGON specific topology parser Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 19:28   ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-08-02 19:46     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 19:51   ` [patch V3a " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 12:58     ` Pu Wen
2023-08-11 17:11       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12  3:58         ` Pu Wen
2023-10-13  9:38           ` [tip: x86/core] x86/cpu/hygon: Fix the CPU topology evaluation for real tip-bot2 for Pu Wen
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 31/40] x86/smpboot: Teach it about topo.amd_node_id Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 32/40] x86/cpu: Use common topology code for AMD Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 33/40] x86/cpu: Use common topology code for HYGON Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 13:00   ` Pu Wen
2023-08-11 17:11     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 34/40] x86/mm/numa: Use core domain size on AMD Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 35/40] x86/cpu: Make topology_amd_node_id() use the actual node info Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 36/40] x86/cpu: Remove topology.c Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 37/40] x86/cpu: Remove x86_coreid_bits Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 38/40] x86/apic: Remove unused phys_pkg_id() callback Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:21 ` [patch V3 39/40] x86/xen/smp_pv: Remove cpudata fiddling Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-02 10:22 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-08-02 11:56 ` [patch V3 00/40] x86/cpu: Rework the topology evaluation Juergen Gross
2023-08-03  0:07 ` Sohil Mehta
2023-08-03  3:44 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230802101934.981826753@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
    --cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=russ.anderson@hpe.com \
    --cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®