* [PATCH] ceph: remove unnecessary IS_ERR() check in ceph_fname_to_usr()
@ 2023-09-29 9:12 Luis Henriques
2023-10-02 11:02 ` Ilya Dryomov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Luis Henriques @ 2023-09-29 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiubo Li, Ilya Dryomov, Jeff Layton
Cc: ceph-devel, linux-kernel, Luis Henriques, kernel test robot,
Dan Carpenter
Before returning, function ceph_fname_to_usr() does a final IS_ERR() check
in 'dir':
if ((dir != fname->dir) && !IS_ERR(dir)) {...}
This check is unnecessary because, if the 'dir' variable has changed to
something other than 'fname->dir' (it's initial value), that error check has
been performed already and, if there was indeed an error, it would have
been returned immediately.
Besides, this useless IS_ERR() is also confusing static analysis tools.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309282202.xZxGdvS3-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
---
fs/ceph/crypto.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/crypto.c b/fs/ceph/crypto.c
index e4d5cd56a80b..e19019209cf0 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/crypto.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/crypto.c
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ int ceph_fname_to_usr(const struct ceph_fname *fname, struct fscrypt_str *tname,
out:
fscrypt_fname_free_buffer(&_tname);
out_inode:
- if ((dir != fname->dir) && !IS_ERR(dir)) {
+ if (dir != fname->dir) {
if ((dir->i_state & I_NEW))
discard_new_inode(dir);
else
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ceph: remove unnecessary IS_ERR() check in ceph_fname_to_usr()
2023-09-29 9:12 [PATCH] ceph: remove unnecessary IS_ERR() check in ceph_fname_to_usr() Luis Henriques
@ 2023-10-02 11:02 ` Ilya Dryomov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2023-10-02 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis Henriques
Cc: Xiubo Li, Jeff Layton, ceph-devel, linux-kernel,
kernel test robot, Dan Carpenter
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:12 AM Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Before returning, function ceph_fname_to_usr() does a final IS_ERR() check
> in 'dir':
>
> if ((dir != fname->dir) && !IS_ERR(dir)) {...}
>
> This check is unnecessary because, if the 'dir' variable has changed to
> something other than 'fname->dir' (it's initial value), that error check has
> been performed already and, if there was indeed an error, it would have
> been returned immediately.
>
> Besides, this useless IS_ERR() is also confusing static analysis tools.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309282202.xZxGdvS3-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/ceph/crypto.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/crypto.c b/fs/ceph/crypto.c
> index e4d5cd56a80b..e19019209cf0 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/crypto.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/crypto.c
> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ int ceph_fname_to_usr(const struct ceph_fname *fname, struct fscrypt_str *tname,
> out:
> fscrypt_fname_free_buffer(&_tname);
> out_inode:
> - if ((dir != fname->dir) && !IS_ERR(dir)) {
> + if (dir != fname->dir) {
> if ((dir->i_state & I_NEW))
> discard_new_inode(dir);
> else
Applied.
Thanks,
Ilya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-02 11:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-29 9:12 [PATCH] ceph: remove unnecessary IS_ERR() check in ceph_fname_to_usr() Luis Henriques
2023-10-02 11:02 ` Ilya Dryomov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®