mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Use update_current_exec_runtime simplify code
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:35:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231106123539.GL8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231031125928.235685-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 08:59:25PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> update_current_exec_runtime would update execution time for each task,
> we can use update_current_exec_runtime simplify code.
> 
> The 1st and 2nd patch update update_current_exec_runtime() applies to all
> callers.
> The 3rd patch use update_current_exec_runtime simplify update_curr.
> 
> Yajun Deng (3):
>   sched: Don't account execution time for task group
>   sched: Don't trace stat runtime for task group
>   sched/fair: Simplify update_curr()
> 
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c  |  4 +---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c      | 13 +++----------
>  kernel/sched/rt.c        |  5 ++---
>  kernel/sched/sched.h     | 11 +++++++----
>  kernel/sched/stop_task.c |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)


Hurmph, so I'm having conflicts against this:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/54d148a144f26d9559698c4dd82d8859038a7380.1699095159.git.bristot@kernel.org

(obviously).. I've resolved the first patch, which also mostly includes
the second patch.

However, your second patch isn't entirely right, it now unconditionally
traces ->vruntime, which isn't the same. Imagine a regular task getting
a PI boost to RT, in that case ->vruntime will be non-zero and the RT
task will now be logging a vruntime.

Anyway, that tracepoint doesn't really make sense to me anyway, that is,
it logs a delta_exec and an absolute vruntime, that's inconsistent.
Also, a delta vruntime can be easily computed because the weight should
be known.

I think I'm going to simply remove the vruntime from that tracepoint and
avoid the whole problem.

This then also makes resolving patch 3 easier.

Let me go squish all this and then I'll post a link to whatever came
out.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-06 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-31 12:59 Yajun Deng
2023-10-31 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sched: Don't account execution time for task group Yajun Deng
2023-11-06 12:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-07  3:49     ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-31 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sched: Don't trace stat runtime " Yajun Deng
2023-10-31 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched/fair: Simplify update_curr() Yajun Deng
2023-11-06 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-11-07  3:39   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Use update_current_exec_runtime simplify code Yajun Deng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231106123539.GL8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yajun.deng@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®