mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/clone3: Make test names for set_tid test stable
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 16:21:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124-eintagsfliege-brennen-385b1d96defe@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231115-kselftest-clone3-set-tid-v1-1-c1932591c480@kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 02:43:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> The test results reported for the clone3_set_tid tests interact poorly with
> automation for running kselftest since the reported test names include TIDs
> dynamically allocated at runtime. A lot of automation for running kselftest
> will compare runs by looking at the test name to identify if the same test
> is being run so changing names make it look like the testsuite has been
> updated to include new tests. This makes the results display less clearly
> and breaks cases like bisection.
> 
> Address this by providing a brief description of the tests and logging that
> along with the stable parameters for the test currently logged. The TIDs
> are already logged separately in existing logging except for the final test
> which has a new log message added. We also tweak the formatting of the
> logging of expected/actual values for clarity.
> 
> There are still issues with the logging of skipped tests (many are simply
> not logged at all when skipped and all are logged with different names) but
> these are less disruptive since the skips are all based on not being run as
> root, a condition likely to be stable for a given test system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---

May I already acked this. Not sure,
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-15 14:43 Mark Brown
2023-11-24 15:21 ` Christian Brauner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231124-eintagsfliege-brennen-385b1d96defe@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®