From: "Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD)" <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, paulmck@kernel.org, Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 4/3] srcu: Use try-lock lockdep annotation for NMI-safe access.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:48:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231213181843.12844-1-neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212174750.GA11886@neeraj.linux>
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
It is claimed that srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() NMI-safe. However it
triggers a lockdep if used from NMI because lockdep expects a deadlock
since nothing disables NMIs while the lock is acquired.
This is because commit f0f44752f5f61 ("rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side
lockdep dependencies") annotates synchronize_srcu() as a write lock
usage. This helps to detect a deadlocks such as
srcu_read_lock();
synchronize_srcu();
srcu_read_unlock();
The side effect is that the lock srcu_struct now has a USED usage in normal
contexts, so it conflicts with a USED_READ usage in NMI. But this shouldn't
cause a real deadlock because the write lock usage from synchronize_srcu()
is a fake one and only used for read/write deadlock detection.
Use a try-lock annotation for srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() to avoid lockdep
complains if used from NMI.
Fixes: f0f44752f5f6 ("rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side lockdep dependencies")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230927160231.XRCDDSK4@linutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/srcu.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index f7206b2623c9..31d523c4e089 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -301,6 +301,11 @@ static inline void rcu_lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *map)
lock_acquire(map, 0, 0, 2, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_);
}
+static inline void rcu_try_lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *map)
+{
+ lock_acquire(map, 0, 1, 2, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_);
+}
+
static inline void rcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
{
lock_release(map, _THIS_IP_);
@@ -315,6 +320,7 @@ int rcu_read_lock_any_held(void);
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
# define rcu_lock_acquire(a) do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_try_lock_acquire(a) do { } while (0)
# define rcu_lock_release(a) do { } while (0)
static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index 127ef3b2e607..236610e4a8fa 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp
srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, true);
retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp);
- rcu_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map);
+ rcu_try_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map);
return retval;
}
--
2.40.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 17:47 [PATCH rcu 0/3] SRCU updates for v6.8 Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD)
2023-12-12 17:48 ` [PATCH rcu 1/3] srcu: Remove superfluous callbacks advancing from srcu_gp_start() Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD)
2023-12-12 17:48 ` [PATCH rcu 2/3] srcu: No need to advance/accelerate if no callback enqueued Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD)
2023-12-12 17:48 ` [PATCH rcu 3/3] srcu: Explain why callbacks invocations can't run concurrently Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD)
2023-12-13 14:27 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-12-13 17:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-12-13 18:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-12-13 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-12-13 19:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-12-13 18:18 ` Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231213181843.12844-1-neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--to=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®