mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 1/2] perf/core: Update perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context()
@ 2024-02-07  5:05 Namhyung Kim
  2024-02-07  5:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf/core: Reduce PMU access to adjust sample freq Namhyung Kim
  2024-04-10  4:57 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/core: Optimize perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-02-07  5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, LKML, Mingwei Zhang

It was unnecessarily disabling and enabling PMUs for each event.  It
should be done at PMU level.  Add pmu_ctx->nr_freq counter to check it
at each PMU.  As pmu context has separate active lists for pinned group
and flexible group, factor out a new function to do the job.

Another minor optimization is that it can skip PMUs w/ CAP_NO_INTERRUPT
even if it needs to unthrottle sampling events.

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h |  6 ++++
 kernel/events/core.c       | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index d2a15c0c6f8a..3e33b366347a 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context {
 
 	unsigned int			nr_events;
 	unsigned int			nr_cgroups;
+	unsigned int			nr_freq;
 
 	atomic_t			refcount; /* event <-> epc */
 	struct rcu_head			rcu_head;
@@ -897,6 +898,11 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context {
 	int				rotate_necessary;
 };
 
+static inline bool perf_pmu_ctx_is_active(struct perf_event_pmu_context *epc)
+{
+	return !list_empty(&epc->flexible_active) || !list_empty(&epc->pinned_active);
+}
+
 struct perf_event_groups {
 	struct rb_root	tree;
 	u64		index;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 59b332cce9e7..e9ce79c8c145 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2277,8 +2277,10 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 
 	if (!is_software_event(event))
 		cpc->active_oncpu--;
-	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq)
+	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq) {
 		ctx->nr_freq--;
+		epc->nr_freq--;
+	}
 	if (event->attr.exclusive || !cpc->active_oncpu)
 		cpc->exclusive = 0;
 
@@ -2533,9 +2535,10 @@ event_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 
 	if (!is_software_event(event))
 		cpc->active_oncpu++;
-	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq)
+	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq) {
 		ctx->nr_freq++;
-
+		epc->nr_freq++;
+	}
 	if (event->attr.exclusive)
 		cpc->exclusive = 1;
 
@@ -4098,30 +4101,14 @@ static void perf_adjust_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 nsec, u64 count, bo
 	}
 }
 
-/*
- * combine freq adjustment with unthrottling to avoid two passes over the
- * events. At the same time, make sure, having freq events does not change
- * the rate of unthrottling as that would introduce bias.
- */
-static void
-perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
+static void perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(struct list_head *event_list)
 {
 	struct perf_event *event;
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
 	u64 now, period = TICK_NSEC;
 	s64 delta;
 
-	/*
-	 * only need to iterate over all events iff:
-	 * - context have events in frequency mode (needs freq adjust)
-	 * - there are events to unthrottle on this cpu
-	 */
-	if (!(ctx->nr_freq || unthrottle))
-		return;
-
-	raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
-
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
+	list_for_each_entry(event, event_list, active_list) {
 		if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
 			continue;
 
@@ -4129,8 +4116,6 @@ perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
 		if (!event_filter_match(event))
 			continue;
 
-		perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
-
 		hwc = &event->hw;
 
 		if (hwc->interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
@@ -4140,7 +4125,7 @@ perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
 		}
 
 		if (!event->attr.freq || !event->attr.sample_freq)
-			goto next;
+			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * stop the event and update event->count
@@ -4162,8 +4147,41 @@ perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
 			perf_adjust_period(event, period, delta, false);
 
 		event->pmu->start(event, delta > 0 ? PERF_EF_RELOAD : 0);
-	next:
-		perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * combine freq adjustment with unthrottling to avoid two passes over the
+ * events. At the same time, make sure, having freq events does not change
+ * the rate of unthrottling as that would introduce bias.
+ */
+static void
+perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
+{
+	struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx;
+
+	/*
+	 * only need to iterate over all events iff:
+	 * - context have events in frequency mode (needs freq adjust)
+	 * - there are events to unthrottle on this cpu
+	 */
+	if (!(ctx->nr_freq || unthrottle))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
+		if (!(pmu_ctx->nr_freq || unthrottle))
+			continue;
+		if (!perf_pmu_ctx_is_active(pmu_ctx))
+			continue;
+		if (pmu_ctx->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT)
+			continue;
+
+		perf_pmu_disable(pmu_ctx->pmu);
+		perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(&pmu_ctx->pinned_active);
+		perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(&pmu_ctx->flexible_active);
+		perf_pmu_enable(pmu_ctx->pmu);
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
-- 
2.43.0.594.gd9cf4e227d-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 2/2] perf/core: Reduce PMU access to adjust sample freq
  2024-02-07  5:05 [PATCH v3 1/2] perf/core: Update perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-02-07  5:05 ` Namhyung Kim
  2024-04-10  4:57   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
  2024-04-10  4:57 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/core: Optimize perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-02-07  5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, LKML, Mingwei Zhang

In perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(), it first starts the event and then
stop unnecessarily to adjust the sampling frequency if the event is
throttled.

For a throttled non-frequency event, it doesn't have a freq so no need
to adjust.  Just starting the event would be ok.

For a frequency event, whether it's throttled or not, it needs to stop
before adjusting the frequency.  That means it should not start the
even if it was throttled.  I tried to skip calling the stop callback,
but it didn't work well since the event count might not be up to date.
It should call the stop callback with PERF_EF_UPDATE anyway.

However not calling start would prevent unnecessary MSR accesses (which
can be costly) for already stopped events as stop state is saved in the
hw config.

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
Ian and Kan, I decided to leave your Reviewed-by here since it's the
basically same.  Please tell me if you don't agree.

 kernel/events/core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index e9ce79c8c145..940c3a5b57b7 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4121,7 +4121,8 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(struct list_head *event_list)
 		if (hwc->interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
 			hwc->interrupts = 0;
 			perf_log_throttle(event, 1);
-			event->pmu->start(event, 0);
+			if (!event->attr.freq || !event->attr.sample_freq)
+				event->pmu->start(event, 0);
 		}
 
 		if (!event->attr.freq || !event->attr.sample_freq)
-- 
2.43.0.594.gd9cf4e227d-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [tip: perf/core] perf/core: Reduce PMU access to adjust sample freq
  2024-02-07  5:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf/core: Reduce PMU access to adjust sample freq Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-04-10  4:57   ` tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim @ 2024-04-10  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: Namhyung Kim, Ingo Molnar, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang, x86, linux-kernel

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     f38628b06c36222367e26820879789ae59e49f60
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/f38628b06c36222367e26820879789ae59e49f60
Author:        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 06 Feb 2024 21:05:45 -08:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 06:13:57 +02:00

perf/core: Reduce PMU access to adjust sample freq

In perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(), it first starts the event and then
stop unnecessarily to adjust the sampling frequency if the event is
throttled.

For a throttled non-frequency event, it doesn't have a freq so no need
to adjust.  Just starting the event would be ok.

For a frequency event, whether it's throttled or not, it needs to stop
before adjusting the frequency.  That means it should not start the
even if it was throttled.  I tried to skip calling the stop callback,
but it didn't work well since the event count might not be up to date.
It should call the stop callback with PERF_EF_UPDATE anyway.

However not calling start would prevent unnecessary MSR accesses (which
can be costly) for already stopped events as stop state is saved in the
hw config.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240207050545.2727923-2-namhyung@kernel.org
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 9566cfb..fd94e45 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4146,7 +4146,8 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(struct list_head *event_list)
 		if (hwc->interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
 			hwc->interrupts = 0;
 			perf_log_throttle(event, 1);
-			event->pmu->start(event, 0);
+			if (!event->attr.freq || !event->attr.sample_freq)
+				event->pmu->start(event, 0);
 		}
 
 		if (!event->attr.freq || !event->attr.sample_freq)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [tip: perf/core] perf/core: Optimize perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context()
  2024-02-07  5:05 [PATCH v3 1/2] perf/core: Update perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() Namhyung Kim
  2024-02-07  5:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf/core: Reduce PMU access to adjust sample freq Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-04-10  4:57 ` tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim @ 2024-04-10  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: Namhyung Kim, Ingo Molnar, Mingwei Zhang, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang,
	x86, linux-kernel

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     0259bf63f71e2accfeca4a4e346ede8edcc86aab
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/0259bf63f71e2accfeca4a4e346ede8edcc86aab
Author:        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 06 Feb 2024 21:05:44 -08:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 06:13:57 +02:00

perf/core: Optimize perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context()

It was unnecessarily disabling and enabling PMUs for each event.  It
should be done at PMU level.  Add pmu_ctx->nr_freq counter to check it
at each PMU.  As PMU context has separate active lists for pinned group
and flexible group, factor out a new function to do the job.

Another minor optimization is that it can skip PMUs w/ CAP_NO_INTERRUPT
even if it needs to unthrottle sampling events.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240207050545.2727923-1-namhyung@kernel.org
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h |  6 +++-
 kernel/events/core.c       | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index d2a15c0..3e33b36 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context {
 
 	unsigned int			nr_events;
 	unsigned int			nr_cgroups;
+	unsigned int			nr_freq;
 
 	atomic_t			refcount; /* event <-> epc */
 	struct rcu_head			rcu_head;
@@ -897,6 +898,11 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context {
 	int				rotate_necessary;
 };
 
+static inline bool perf_pmu_ctx_is_active(struct perf_event_pmu_context *epc)
+{
+	return !list_empty(&epc->flexible_active) || !list_empty(&epc->pinned_active);
+}
+
 struct perf_event_groups {
 	struct rb_root	tree;
 	u64		index;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 724e6d7..9566cfb 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2302,8 +2302,10 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 
 	if (!is_software_event(event))
 		cpc->active_oncpu--;
-	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq)
+	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq) {
 		ctx->nr_freq--;
+		epc->nr_freq--;
+	}
 	if (event->attr.exclusive || !cpc->active_oncpu)
 		cpc->exclusive = 0;
 
@@ -2558,9 +2560,10 @@ event_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 
 	if (!is_software_event(event))
 		cpc->active_oncpu++;
-	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq)
+	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq) {
 		ctx->nr_freq++;
-
+		epc->nr_freq++;
+	}
 	if (event->attr.exclusive)
 		cpc->exclusive = 1;
 
@@ -4123,30 +4126,14 @@ static void perf_adjust_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 nsec, u64 count, bo
 	}
 }
 
-/*
- * combine freq adjustment with unthrottling to avoid two passes over the
- * events. At the same time, make sure, having freq events does not change
- * the rate of unthrottling as that would introduce bias.
- */
-static void
-perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
+static void perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(struct list_head *event_list)
 {
 	struct perf_event *event;
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
 	u64 now, period = TICK_NSEC;
 	s64 delta;
 
-	/*
-	 * only need to iterate over all events iff:
-	 * - context have events in frequency mode (needs freq adjust)
-	 * - there are events to unthrottle on this cpu
-	 */
-	if (!(ctx->nr_freq || unthrottle))
-		return;
-
-	raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
-
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
+	list_for_each_entry(event, event_list, active_list) {
 		if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
 			continue;
 
@@ -4154,8 +4141,6 @@ perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
 		if (!event_filter_match(event))
 			continue;
 
-		perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
-
 		hwc = &event->hw;
 
 		if (hwc->interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
@@ -4165,7 +4150,7 @@ perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
 		}
 
 		if (!event->attr.freq || !event->attr.sample_freq)
-			goto next;
+			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * stop the event and update event->count
@@ -4187,8 +4172,41 @@ perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
 			perf_adjust_period(event, period, delta, false);
 
 		event->pmu->start(event, delta > 0 ? PERF_EF_RELOAD : 0);
-	next:
-		perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * combine freq adjustment with unthrottling to avoid two passes over the
+ * events. At the same time, make sure, having freq events does not change
+ * the rate of unthrottling as that would introduce bias.
+ */
+static void
+perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool unthrottle)
+{
+	struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx;
+
+	/*
+	 * only need to iterate over all events iff:
+	 * - context have events in frequency mode (needs freq adjust)
+	 * - there are events to unthrottle on this cpu
+	 */
+	if (!(ctx->nr_freq || unthrottle))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
+		if (!(pmu_ctx->nr_freq || unthrottle))
+			continue;
+		if (!perf_pmu_ctx_is_active(pmu_ctx))
+			continue;
+		if (pmu_ctx->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT)
+			continue;
+
+		perf_pmu_disable(pmu_ctx->pmu);
+		perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(&pmu_ctx->pinned_active);
+		perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(&pmu_ctx->flexible_active);
+		perf_pmu_enable(pmu_ctx->pmu);
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-10  4:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-07  5:05 [PATCH v3 1/2] perf/core: Update perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() Namhyung Kim
2024-02-07  5:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf/core: Reduce PMU access to adjust sample freq Namhyung Kim
2024-04-10  4:57   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
2024-04-10  4:57 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/core: Optimize perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®