mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] powercap: dtpm_cpu: Fix error check against freq_qos_add_request()
@ 2024-02-13 22:39 Daniel Lezcano
  2024-02-16 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2024-02-13 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rafael; +Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, Daniel Lezcano

The caller of the function freq_qos_add_request() checks again a non
zero value but freq_qos_add_request() can return '1' if the request
already exists. Therefore, the setup function fails while the QoS
request actually did not failed.

Fix that by changing the check against a negative value like all the
other callers of the function.

Fixes: 0e8f68d7f0485 ("Add CPU energy model based support")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
index 9193c3b8edeb..ae7ee611978b 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
 	ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints,
 				   &dtpm_cpu->qos_req, FREQ_QOS_MAX,
 				   pd->table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].frequency);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out_dtpm_unregister;
 
 	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powercap: dtpm_cpu: Fix error check against freq_qos_add_request()
  2024-02-13 22:39 [PATCH] powercap: dtpm_cpu: Fix error check against freq_qos_add_request() Daniel Lezcano
@ 2024-02-16 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2024-02-16 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Lezcano; +Cc: rafael, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Daniel Lezcano

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:39 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The caller of the function freq_qos_add_request() checks again a non
> zero value but freq_qos_add_request() can return '1' if the request
> already exists. Therefore, the setup function fails while the QoS
> request actually did not failed.
>
> Fix that by changing the check against a negative value like all the
> other callers of the function.
>
> Fixes: 0e8f68d7f0485 ("Add CPU energy model based support")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
> index 9193c3b8edeb..ae7ee611978b 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
>         ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints,
>                                    &dtpm_cpu->qos_req, FREQ_QOS_MAX,
>                                    pd->table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].frequency);
> -       if (ret)
> +       if (ret < 0)
>                 goto out_dtpm_unregister;
>
>         cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> --

Applied as 6.9 material, thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-16 19:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-13 22:39 [PATCH] powercap: dtpm_cpu: Fix error check against freq_qos_add_request() Daniel Lezcano
2024-02-16 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®