mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	"Shanker Donthineni" <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] irq/spurious: Account for multiple handles in note_interrupt
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 04:59:44 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240216075948.131372-4-leobras@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216075948.131372-2-leobras@redhat.com>

Currently note_interrupt() will check threads_handled for changes and use
it to mark an IRQ as handled, in order to avoid having a threaded
interrupt to falsely trigger unhandled IRQ detection.

This detection can still be falsely triggered if we have many IRQ handled
accounted between each check of threads_handled, as those will be counted
as a single one in the unhandled IRQ detection.

In order to fix this, subtract from irqs_unhandled the number of IRQs
handled since the last check (threads_handled_last - threads_handled).

Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/irqdesc.h |  2 +-
 kernel/irq/spurious.c   | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
index 62aff209315fe..957ac02e9ec2b 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ struct irq_desc {
 	unsigned long		last_unhandled;	/* Aging timer for unhandled count */
 	unsigned int		irqs_unhandled;
 	atomic_t		threads_handled;
-	int			threads_handled_last;
+	unsigned int		threads_handled_last;
 	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
 	struct cpumask		*percpu_enabled;
 	const struct cpumask	*percpu_affinity;
diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index d92f33b2e31ee..4e8e2727b8beb 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -267,6 +267,28 @@ try_misrouted_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
 	return action && (action->flags & IRQF_IRQPOLL);
 }
 
+static inline int get_handled_diff(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	unsigned int handled;
+	int diff;
+
+	handled = (unsigned int)atomic_read(&desc->threads_handled);
+	handled |= SPURIOUS_DEFERRED;
+
+	diff = handled - desc->threads_handled_last;
+	diff >>= SPURIOUS_DEFERRED_SHIFT;
+
+	/*
+	 * Note: We keep the SPURIOUS_DEFERRED bit set. We are handling the
+	 * previous invocation right now. Keep it for the current one, so the
+	 * next hardware interrupt will account for it.
+	 */
+	if (diff != 0)
+		desc->threads_handled_last = handled;
+
+	return diff;
+}
+
 void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
 {
 	unsigned int irq;
@@ -308,7 +330,7 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
 		 * interrupt.
 		 */
 		if (action_ret == IRQ_WAKE_THREAD) {
-			int handled;
+			int diff;
 			/*
 			 * We use bit 0 of thread_handled_last to
 			 * denote the deferred spurious detection
@@ -325,27 +347,20 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
 			 * Check whether one of the threaded handlers
 			 * returned IRQ_HANDLED since the last
 			 * interrupt happened.
-			 *
-			 * For simplicity we just set bit 0, as it is
-			 * set in threads_handled_last as well. So we
-			 * avoid extra masking. And we really do not
-			 * care about the high bits of the handled
-			 * count. We just care about the count being
-			 * different than the one we saw before.
 			 */
-			handled = atomic_read(&desc->threads_handled);
-			handled |= SPURIOUS_DEFERRED;
-			if (handled != desc->threads_handled_last) {
-				action_ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
+			diff = get_handled_diff(desc);
+			if (diff > 0) {
 				/*
-				 * Note: We keep the SPURIOUS_DEFERRED
-				 * bit set. We are handling the
-				 * previous invocation right now.
-				 * Keep it for the current one, so the
-				 * next hardware interrupt will
-				 * account for it.
+				 * Subtract from irqs_unhandled	the number of
+				 * IRQs handled since the last change in
+				 * threads_handled.
 				 */
-				desc->threads_handled_last = handled;
+				if (diff < desc->irqs_unhandled)
+					desc->irqs_unhandled -= diff;
+				else
+					desc->irqs_unhandled = 0;
+
+				action_ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
 			} else {
 				/*
 				 * None of the threaded handlers felt
-- 
2.43.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-16  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-16  7:59 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Fix force_irqthread + fast triggered edge-type IRQs Leonardo Bras
2024-02-16  7:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] irq: Move spurious_deferred bit from BIT(31) to BIT(0) Leonardo Bras
2024-02-16  7:59 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2024-02-16 15:36   ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] irq/spurious: Account for multiple handles in note_interrupt Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-16 20:18     ` Leonardo Bras
2024-02-16  7:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] irq: Introduce IRQ_HANDLED_MANY Leonardo Bras
2024-02-19  9:59   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-19 11:03     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-21  5:39       ` Leonardo Bras
2024-02-21 15:41         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-21 17:04           ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-23  4:52             ` Leonardo Bras
2024-02-23  4:37           ` Leonardo Bras
2024-02-23  7:33             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-14  3:40             ` Leonardo Bras
2024-11-14  7:50               ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-19  1:15                 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-11-19 10:06                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-02 22:53                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-16  7:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] tty/serial8250: Make use of IRQ_HANDLED_MANY interface Leonardo Bras
2024-02-16 10:12   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-16 19:58     ` Leonardo Bras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240216075948.131372-4-leobras@redhat.com \
    --to=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®