From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
To: <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <hejunhao3@huawei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, <fanghao11@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix incorrect counting under metric mode
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:33:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223103359.18669-4-yangyicong@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223103359.18669-1-yangyicong@huawei.com>
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
The metric counting shows incorrect results if the events in the
metric group using the same event but different filter options.
This is because we only judge the event code to decide whether
the event in the metric group should share the same hardware
counter, but ignore the settings of the filter.
For example, on a platform of 2 ports 0x1 and 0x2 but only port
0x1 has a downstream PCIe NVME device. The metric counting
shows both ports have the same counts because we misassign these
two events to one same hardware counter:
[root@localhost perf-iostat]# ./perf stat -e '{hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x2/,hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x1/}'
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
7907484924 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x2/
7907484924 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x1/
10.153863691 seconds time elapsed
Fix this by using the whole config rather than the event only
to judge whether two events are the same and should share the
same hardware counter. With this patch, the metric counting in
the above case tends to be corrected:
[root@localhost perf-iostat]# ./perf stat -e '{hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x2/,hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x1/}'
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x2/
8123122077 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x1/
10.152875631 seconds time elapsed
Fixes: 8404b0fbc7fb ("drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe PMU")
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
---
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
index 2468cf3b007c..9176242eadb3 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
@@ -314,10 +314,16 @@ static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_valid_filter(struct perf_event *event,
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Check Whether two events share the same config. The same config means not
+ * only the event code, but also the filter settings of the two events are
+ * the same.
+ */
static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_cmp_event(struct perf_event *target,
struct perf_event *event)
{
- return hisi_pcie_get_real_event(target) == hisi_pcie_get_real_event(event);
+ return hisi_pcie_pmu_get_event_ctrl_val(target) ==
+ hisi_pcie_pmu_get_event_ctrl_val(event);
}
static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_validate_event_group(struct perf_event *event)
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 10:33 [PATCH v2 0/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Several updates for HiSilicon PCIe PMU driver Yicong Yang
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Rename hisi_pcie_pmu_{config,clear}_filter() Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Introduce hisi_pcie_pmu_get_event_ctrl_val() Yicong Yang
2024-02-23 10:33 ` Yicong Yang [this message]
2024-02-26 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix incorrect counting under metric mode Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Add more events for counting TLP bandwidth Yicong Yang
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Check the target filter properly Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Relax the check on related events Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Merge find_related_event() and get_event_idx() Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] docs: perf: Update usage for target filter of hisi-pcie-pmu Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-04 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Several updates for HiSilicon PCIe PMU driver Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240223103359.18669-4-yangyicong@huawei.com \
--to=yangyicong@huawei.com \
--cc=fanghao11@huawei.com \
--cc=hejunhao3@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®