From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
To: <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <hejunhao3@huawei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, <fanghao11@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Check the target filter properly
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:33:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223103359.18669-6-yangyicong@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223103359.18669-1-yangyicong@huawei.com>
From: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
The PMU can monitor traffic of certain target Root Port or downstream
target Endpoint. User can specify the target filter by the "port" or
"bdf" option respectively. The PMU can only monitor the Root Port or
Endpoint on the same PCIe core so the value of "port" or "bdf" should
be valid and will be checked by the driver.
Currently at least and only one of "port" and "bdf" option must be set.
If "port" filter is not set or is set explicitly to zero (default),
driver will regard the user specifies a "bdf" option since "port" option
is a bitmask of the target Root Ports and zero is not a valid
value.
If user not explicitly set "port" or "bdf" filter, the driver uses "bdf"
default value (zero) to set target filter, but driver will skip the
check of bdf=0, although it's a valid value (meaning 0000:000:00.0).
Then the user just gets zero.
Therefore, we need to check if both "port" and "bdf" are invalid, then
return failure and report warning.
Testing:
before the patch:
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux/
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0/
24,124 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=1/
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=0/
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x800/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=1/
24,132 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=0x1700/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x0/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x1/
24,138 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x1700/
24,126 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x1,bdf=0x0/
after the patch:
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0/
24,153 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=1/
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x800/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=0/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=1/
24,117 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=0x1700/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x0/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x1/
24,120 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x1700/
24,123 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x1,bdf=0x0/
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
---
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
index 6f39cb82661e..b2dde7559639 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
@@ -306,10 +306,10 @@ static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_valid_filter(struct perf_event *event,
if (hisi_pcie_get_trig_len(event) > HISI_PCIE_TRIG_MAX_VAL)
return false;
- if (requester_id) {
- if (!hisi_pcie_pmu_valid_requester_id(pcie_pmu, requester_id))
- return false;
- }
+ /* Need to explicitly set filter of "port" or "bdf" */
+ if (!hisi_pcie_get_port(event) &&
+ !hisi_pcie_pmu_valid_requester_id(pcie_pmu, requester_id))
+ return false;
return true;
}
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 10:33 [PATCH v2 0/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Several updates for HiSilicon PCIe PMU driver Yicong Yang
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Rename hisi_pcie_pmu_{config,clear}_filter() Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Introduce hisi_pcie_pmu_get_event_ctrl_val() Yicong Yang
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix incorrect counting under metric mode Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Add more events for counting TLP bandwidth Yicong Yang
2024-02-23 10:33 ` Yicong Yang [this message]
2024-02-26 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Check the target filter properly Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Relax the check on related events Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Merge find_related_event() and get_event_idx() Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] docs: perf: Update usage for target filter of hisi-pcie-pmu Yicong Yang
2024-02-26 15:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-04 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Several updates for HiSilicon PCIe PMU driver Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240223103359.18669-6-yangyicong@huawei.com \
--to=yangyicong@huawei.com \
--cc=fanghao11@huawei.com \
--cc=hejunhao3@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®