From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@linux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"lulu@redhat.com" <lulu@redhat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
"joao.m.martins@oracle.com" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
"Zeng, Xin" <xin.zeng@intel.com>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Introduce a replace API for device pasid
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:52:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240318165247.GD5825@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <749b23c7-ab0e-42b4-9992-e1867fc7d4d7@intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 04:11:41PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> yes. how about your opinion? @Jason. I noticed the set_dev_pasid callback
> and pasid_array update is under the group->lock, so update it should be
> fine to adjust the order to update pasid_array after set_dev_pasid returns.
Yes, it makes some sense
But, also I would like it very much if we just have the core pass in
the actual old domain as a an addition function argument.
I think we have some small mistakes in multi-device group error
unwinding for remove because the global xarray can't isn't actually
going to be correct in all scenarios.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 6:34 [PATCH 0/8] iommufd support pasid attach/replace Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Introduce a replace API for device pasid Yi Liu
2024-01-15 17:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-10 13:05 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-11 9:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-03-12 3:07 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-13 3:13 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-13 8:11 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-18 16:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-03-19 7:29 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-20 12:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-21 6:16 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-21 11:26 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-21 12:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-21 13:58 ` Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 2/8] iommufd: replace attach_fn with a structure Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommufd: Support attach/replace hwpt per pasid Yi Liu
2024-01-15 17:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 1:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-16 12:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-17 4:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-17 8:24 ` Yi Liu
2024-01-17 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-18 9:28 ` Yi Liu
2024-01-18 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-19 10:15 ` Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommufd/selftest: Add set_dev_pasid and remove_dev_pasid in mock iommu Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommufd/selftest: Add a helper to get test device Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommufd/selftest: Add test ops to test pasid attach/detach Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for iommufd " Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/vt-d: Add set_dev_pasid callback for nested domain Yi Liu
2023-12-14 2:55 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-12-14 13:33 ` Baolu Lu
2023-12-15 0:37 ` Yang, Weijiang
2024-01-15 17:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-17 8:20 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240318165247.GD5825@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xin.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome