From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: "joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@linux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"lulu@redhat.com" <lulu@redhat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
"joao.m.martins@oracle.com" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
"Zeng, Xin" <xin.zeng@intel.com>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Introduce a replace API for device pasid
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:07:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <585423de-9173-4c97-b596-71e1564d8b4e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52766161477C2540969C83568C242@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2024/3/11 17:26, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2024 9:06 PM
>>
>> On 2024/1/16 01:19, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>>>> +int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>>>> + struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;
>>>> + struct iommu_domain *old_domain;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!domain)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!group)
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
>>>> + __iommu_remove_group_pasid(group, pasid);
>>>
>>> It is not replace if you do remove first.
>>>
>>> Replace must just call set_dev_pasid and nothing much else..
>>
>> Seems uneasy to do it so far. The VT-d driver needs to get the old domain
>> first in order to do replacement. However, VT-d driver does not track the
>> attached domains of pasids. It gets domain of a pasid
>> by iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(). Like
>> intel_iommu_remove_dev_pasid)
>> in link [1]. While the iommu layer exchanges the domain in the
>> group->pasid_array before calling into VT-d driver. So when calling into
>> VT-d driver, the domain got by iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid() is
>> already
>> the new domain. To solve it, we may need to let VT-d driver have its
>> own tracking on the domains. How about your thoughts? @Jason, @Kevin,
>> @Baoplu?
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu
>> .c#L4621C19-L4621C20
>>
>
> Jason's point was that the core helper should directly call set_dev_pasid
> and underlying iommu driver decides whether atomic replacement
> can be implemented inside the callback. If you first remove in the core
> then one can never implement a replace semantics.
yeah, I got Jason's point. I'm raising an open to make the set_dev_pasid
callback to handle domain replacement. The existing intel iommu driver
does not track attached domains for pasid. But it's needed to know the
attached domain of a pasid and find the dev_pasid under the domain, hence
be able to clean up the old attachment and do the new attachment. Existing
code cannot work as I mentioned above. The group->pasid_xarray is updated
before calling set_dev_pasid callback. This means the underlying iommu
driver cannot get the old domain in the set_dev_pasid callback by the
iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid() helper.
As above, I'm considering the possibility to track attached domains for
pasid by an xarray in the struct device_domain_info. Hence, intel iommu
driver could store/retrieve attached domain for pasids. If it's
replacement, the set_dev_pasid callback could find the attached domain and
the dev_pasid instance in the domain. Then be able to do detach and clean
up the tracking structures (e.g. dev_pasid).
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index e58263dcfadd..03a847a406e1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4398,6 +4398,7 @@ static struct iommu_device
*intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
info->dev = dev;
info->iommu = iommu;
+ xa_init(&info->pasid_array);
if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
if (ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap) &&
pci_ats_supported(pdev) &&
@@ -4464,6 +4465,7 @@ static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device
*dev)
mutex_unlock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
intel_pasid_free_table(dev);
+ WARN_ON(!xa_empty(&info->pasid_array));
intel_iommu_debugfs_remove_dev(info);
kfree(info);
set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
@@ -4707,7 +4709,13 @@ static int intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map(struct
iommu_domain *domain,
return 0;
}
-static void intel_iommu_remove_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
+/*
+ * Clear the pasid table entries so that all DMA requests with specific
+ * PASID from the device are blocked. If the page table has been set, clean
+ * up the data structures.
+ */
+static void device_pasid_block_translation(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid,
+ bool remove)
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct dev_pasid_info *curr, *dev_pasid = NULL;
@@ -4716,9 +4724,11 @@ static void intel_iommu_remove_dev_pasid(struct
device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
struct iommu_domain *domain;
unsigned long flags;
- domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(dev, pasid, 0);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!domain))
+ domain = xa_erase(&info->pasid_array, pasid);
+ if (!domain) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(remove);
return;
+ }
/*
* The SVA implementation needs to handle its own stuffs like the mm
@@ -4753,6 +4763,11 @@ static void intel_iommu_remove_dev_pasid(struct
device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
intel_drain_pasid_prq(dev, pasid);
}
+static void intel_iommu_remove_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
+{
+ device_pasid_block_translation(dev, pasid, true);
+}
+
static int intel_iommu_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
{
@@ -4772,6 +4787,9 @@ static int intel_iommu_set_dev_pasid(struct
iommu_domain *domain,
if (context_copied(iommu, info->bus, info->devfn))
return -EBUSY;
+ /* Try to block translation if it already has */
+ device_pasid_block_translation(dev, pasid, false);
+
ret = prepare_domain_attach_device(domain, dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -4801,6 +4819,8 @@ static int intel_iommu_set_dev_pasid(struct
iommu_domain *domain,
list_add(&dev_pasid->link_domain, &dmar_domain->dev_pasids);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
+ xa_store(&info->pasid_array, pasid, dmar_domain, GFP_KERNEL);
+
if (domain->type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING)
intel_iommu_debugfs_create_dev_pasid(dev_pasid);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index 94e2ecc3c73f..a466555f61fe 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ struct device_domain_info {
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEBUGFS
struct dentry *debugfs_dentry; /* pointer to device directory dentry */
#endif
+ struct xarray pasid_array; /* Attached domains per PASID */
};
struct dev_pasid_info {
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-12 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 6:34 [PATCH 0/8] iommufd support pasid attach/replace Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Introduce a replace API for device pasid Yi Liu
2024-01-15 17:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-10 13:05 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-11 9:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-03-12 3:07 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2024-03-13 3:13 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-13 8:11 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-18 16:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-19 7:29 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-20 12:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-21 6:16 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-21 11:26 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-21 12:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-21 13:58 ` Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 2/8] iommufd: replace attach_fn with a structure Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommufd: Support attach/replace hwpt per pasid Yi Liu
2024-01-15 17:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 1:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-16 12:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-17 4:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-17 8:24 ` Yi Liu
2024-01-17 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-18 9:28 ` Yi Liu
2024-01-18 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-19 10:15 ` Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommufd/selftest: Add set_dev_pasid and remove_dev_pasid in mock iommu Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommufd/selftest: Add a helper to get test device Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommufd/selftest: Add test ops to test pasid attach/detach Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for iommufd " Yi Liu
2023-11-27 6:34 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/vt-d: Add set_dev_pasid callback for nested domain Yi Liu
2023-12-14 2:55 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-12-14 13:33 ` Baolu Lu
2023-12-15 0:37 ` Yang, Weijiang
2024-01-15 17:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-17 8:20 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=585423de-9173-4c97-b596-71e1564d8b4e@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xin.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome