From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>,
"Richard Fitzgerald" <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] regmap: kunit: Add test cases for regmap_read_bypassed()
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:46:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240408144600.230848-12-rf@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240408144600.230848-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
This adds test cases to prove that regmap_read_bypassed() reads
the hardware value while the regmap is in cache-only.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
This depends on pending commit ("regmap: Add regmap_read_bypassed()")
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sound/20240408101803.43183-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com/T/#m2b99b1e01872bfc3597e89dee57dcdd5dbaf1b55
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
index 6e469609c82c..44265dc2313d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
@@ -295,6 +295,135 @@ static void bulk_read(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, config.cache_type == REGCACHE_NONE, data->read[i]);
}
+static void read_bypassed(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regmap_config config;
+ struct regmap_ram_data *data;
+ unsigned int val[BLOCK_TEST_SIZE], rval;
+ int i;
+
+ config = test_regmap_config;
+
+ map = gen_regmap(test, &config, &data);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(map));
+ if (IS_ERR(map))
+ return;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, map->cache_bypass);
+
+ get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val));
+
+ /* Write some test values */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_bulk_write(map, param->from_reg, val, ARRAY_SIZE(val)));
+
+ regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+
+ /*
+ * While in cache-only regmap_read_bypassed() should return the register
+ * value and leave the map in cache-only.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(val); i++) {
+ /* Put inverted bits in rval to prove we really read the value */
+ rval = ~val[i];
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read(map, param->from_reg + i, &rval));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val[i], rval);
+
+ rval = ~val[i];
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read_bypassed(map, param->from_reg + i, &rval));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val[i], rval);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, map->cache_only);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, map->cache_bypass);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Change the underlying register values to prove it is returning
+ * real values not cached values.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(val); i++) {
+ val[i] = ~val[i];
+ data->vals[param->from_reg + i] = val[i];
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(val); i++) {
+ rval = ~val[i];
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read(map, param->from_reg + i, &rval));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, val[i], rval);
+
+ rval = ~val[i];
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read_bypassed(map, param->from_reg + i, &rval));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val[i], rval);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, map->cache_only);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, map->cache_bypass);
+ }
+}
+
+static void read_bypassed_volatile(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regmap_config config;
+ struct regmap_ram_data *data;
+ unsigned int val[BLOCK_TEST_SIZE], rval;
+ int i;
+
+ config = test_regmap_config;
+ /* All registers except #5 volatile */
+ config.volatile_reg = reg_5_false;
+
+ map = gen_regmap(test, &config, &data);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(map));
+ if (IS_ERR(map))
+ return;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, map->cache_bypass);
+
+ get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val));
+
+ /* Write some test values */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_bulk_write(map, param->from_reg, val, ARRAY_SIZE(val)));
+
+ regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+
+ /*
+ * While in cache-only regmap_read_bypassed() should return the register
+ * value and leave the map in cache-only.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(val); i++) {
+ /* Register #5 is non-volatile so should read from cache */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (i == 5) ? 0 : -EBUSY,
+ regmap_read(map, param->from_reg + i, &rval));
+
+ /* Put inverted bits in rval to prove we really read the value */
+ rval = ~val[i];
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read_bypassed(map, param->from_reg + i, &rval));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val[i], rval);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, map->cache_only);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, map->cache_bypass);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Change the underlying register values to prove it is returning
+ * real values not cached values.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(val); i++) {
+ val[i] = ~val[i];
+ data->vals[param->from_reg + i] = val[i];
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(val); i++) {
+ if (i == 5)
+ continue;
+
+ rval = ~val[i];
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read_bypassed(map, param->from_reg + i, &rval));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val[i], rval);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, map->cache_only);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, map->cache_bypass);
+ }
+}
+
static void write_readonly(struct kunit *test)
{
struct regmap *map;
@@ -1747,6 +1876,8 @@ static void raw_ranges(struct kunit *test)
static struct kunit_case regmap_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(basic_read_write, regcache_types_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(read_bypassed, real_cache_types_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(read_bypassed_volatile, real_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(bulk_write, regcache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(bulk_read, regcache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(write_readonly, regcache_types_gen_params),
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 14:45 [PATCH 00/11] regmap: kunit: Add some test cases and a few small improvements Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] regmap: kunit: Fix warnings of implicit casts to __le16 and __be16 Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] regmap: kunit: Create a struct device for the regmap Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] regmap: kunit: Introduce struct for test case parameters Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] regmap: kunit: Run sparse cache tests at non-zero register addresses Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-16 19:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-17 11:28 ` Mark Brown
2024-05-17 15:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-17 11:58 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-17 13:10 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-17 15:44 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-17 15:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] regmap: kunit: Run non-sparse " Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] regmap: kunit: Add more cache-drop tests Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 07/11] regmap: kunit: Add more cache-sync tests Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 08/11] regmap: kunit: Use a KUnit action to call regmap_exit() Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] regmap: kunit: Replace a kmalloc/kfree() pair with KUnit-managed alloc Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 10/11] regmap: kunit: Add cache-drop test with multiple cache blocks Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:46 ` Richard Fitzgerald [this message]
2024-04-09 23:34 ` [PATCH 00/11] regmap: kunit: Add some test cases and a few small improvements Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240408144600.230848-12-rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®