* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-04-15 17:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-15 19:47 ` Pavel Machek
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-04-15 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 4/15/2024 7:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.87-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-04-15 19:47 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-15 23:53 ` Kelsey Steele
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-04-15 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 796 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
No problems detected in Linux 5.15.156-rc1 (8d83652ef6bf), Linux
6.6.28-rc1 (a4e5ff353287), Linux 6.8.7-rc1 (367141eaada2), either.
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-15 19:47 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-04-15 23:53 ` Kelsey Steele
2024-04-16 0:17 ` Mark Brown
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2024-04-15 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 04:20:31PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
No regressions found on WSL (x86 and arm64).
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you. :)
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-15 23:53 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2024-04-16 0:17 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-16 6:34 ` Ron Economos
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-04-16 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 04:20:31PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-16 0:17 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-04-16 6:34 ` Ron Economos
2024-04-16 11:55 ` Yann Sionneau
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-04-16 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 4/15/24 7:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.87-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-16 6:34 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-04-16 11:55 ` Yann Sionneau
2024-04-16 12:03 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Yann Sionneau @ 2024-04-16 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
Hi Greg,
On 4/15/24 16:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.87-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
I tested 6.1.87-rc1 (6745a5f2c806) on Kalray kvx arch (not upstream yet) and everything looks good!
It ran on real hw (k200, k200lp and k300 boards), on qemu as well as on our internal instruction set simulator (ISS).
Tests were run on several interfaces/drivers (usb, qsfp ethernet, eMMC, PCIe endpoint+RC, SPI, remoteproc, uart, iommu). LTP and uClibc-ng testsuites are also run without any regression.
Everything looks fine to us.
Tested-by: Yann Sionneau<ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>
--
Yann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-16 11:55 ` Yann Sionneau
@ 2024-04-16 12:03 ` Jon Hunter
2024-04-16 14:22 ` Pascal Ernster
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-04-16 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:20:31 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.87-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.87-rc1-g6745a5f2c806
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-16 12:03 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-04-16 14:22 ` Pascal Ernster
2024-04-16 20:18 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-04-17 7:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pascal Ernster @ 2024-04-16 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[2024-04-15 16:20] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.87-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, 6.1.87-rc1 is running fine on a TP-Link Archer C7 v4 (the SoC is a
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9563, which has a 74Kc MIPS core).
Regards
Pascal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-16 14:22 ` Pascal Ernster
@ 2024-04-16 20:18 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-04-17 7:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mateusz Jończyk @ 2024-04-16 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
W dniu 15.04.2024 o 16:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman pisze:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.87-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hello,
Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Tested on a HP 17-by0001nw laptop with an Intel Kaby Lake CPU and Ubuntu 20.04.
Stack:
- amd64,
- ext4 on top of LVM on top of LUKS on top of mdraid on top of
NVMe and SATA drives (the SATA drive in the write-mostly mode).
Tested (lightly):
- suspend to RAM,
- suspend to disk,
- virtual machines in QEMU (both i386 and amd64 guests),
- GPU (Intel HD Graphics 620, with 2 Unigine benchmarks)
- WiFi (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- Bluetooth (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- PCI soundcard (Intel HD Audio),
- webcam.
Filesystems tested very lightly (mounting, listing and opening files):
- NFS,
- exFAT
- NTFS via FUSE
Nitpicks:
- sound output does not automatically switch from HDMI to speakers (also present on other kernels),
- sound issues in the Unigine tropics benchmark (no sound after switching of the sound output, program restart was necessary).
- problems with sending Bluetooth files from mobile phone, likely caused by previous BT experiments.
Greetings,
Mateusz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review
2024-04-15 14:20 [PATCH 6.1 00/69] 6.1.87-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-16 20:18 ` Mateusz Jończyk
@ 2024-04-17 7:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-04-17 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 20:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.87 release.
> There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.87-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.87-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 6745a5f2c8063076bb5a9cd18ede5a5559258492
* git describe: v6.1.86-70-g6745a5f2c806
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.86-70-g6745a5f2c806
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.86)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.86)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.86)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.86)
## Test result summary
total: 237743, pass: 204447, fail: 4019, skip: 28994, xfail: 283
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 138 total, 138 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 36 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread