* Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation
@ 2024-06-23 14:34 Jari Ruusu
2024-06-24 17:09 ` Pawan Gupta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jari Ruusu @ 2024-06-23 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pawan Gupta; +Cc: Dave Hansen, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
I have 32-bit x86 linux virtual machine running on
QEMU-8.2.2+ds-0ubuntu1 with KVM acceleration. QEMU emulated
CPU model is pentium2. Host is 64-bit linux running on Intel
i5-7200U with latest microcode. Inside that 32-bit x86 linux
VM I sometimes start dosemu to run some old MS-DOS programs.
Now dosemu fails to start with "Segmentation fault" error,
and this shows up in dmesg output:
[ 23.768348] general protection fault: 0000 [#1]
[ 23.768353] CPU: 0 PID: 1730 Comm: dosemu.bin Not tainted 5.10.214-test12345 #1
[ 23.768354] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 23.768358] EIP: restore_all_switch_stack+0xbd/0xc5
[ 23.768359] Code: 10 36 89 48 fc 8b 4c 24 0c 81 e1 ff ff 00 00 36 89 48 f8 8b 4c 24 08 36 89 48 f4 8b 4c 24 04 36 89 48 f0 59 8d 60 f0 58 89 f6 <0f> 00 2d 80 87 5c c1 cf fc 0f a0 50 b8 00 00 00 00 8e e0 8c d0 66
[ 23.768361] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
[ 23.768362] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ffc03fdc
[ 23.768363] DS: 0000 ES: 0000 FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
[ 23.768366] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00a33020 CR3: 0fc3b000 CR4: 00000290
[ 23.768368] Call Trace:
[ 23.768371] ? show_regs+0x5d/0x60
[ 23.768373] ? __die_body+0x10/0x43
[ 23.768374] ? die_addr+0x27/0x3c
[ 23.768376] ? exc_general_protection+0x1e6/0x239
[ 23.768378] ? exc_bounds+0x8a/0x8a
[ 23.768379] ? handle_exception+0x147/0x147
[ 23.768381] ? exc_bounds+0x8a/0x8a
[ 23.768386] ? restore_all_switch_stack+0xbd/0xc5
[ 23.768388] ? exc_bounds+0x8a/0x8a
[ 23.768389] ? restore_all_switch_stack+0xbd/0xc5
[ 23.768390] Modules linked in:
[ 23.768392] ---[ end trace 960c0712f12c2f48 ]---
[ 23.768394] EIP: restore_all_switch_stack+0xbd/0xc5
[ 23.768395] Code: 10 36 89 48 fc 8b 4c 24 0c 81 e1 ff ff 00 00 36 89 48 f8 8b 4c 24 08 36 89 48 f4 8b 4c 24 04 36 89 48 f0 59 8d 60 f0 58 89 f6 <0f> 00 2d 80 87 5c c1 cf fc 0f a0 50 b8 00 00 00 00 8e e0 8c d0 66
[ 23.768396] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
[ 23.768397] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ffc03fdc
[ 23.768398] DS: 0000 ES: 0000 FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
[ 23.768400] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00a33020 CR3: 0fc3b000 CR4: 00000290
Inside that 32-bit VM, kernel.org linux-5.10.214 and earlier
5.10.x versions start dosemu normally.
Inside that 32-bit VM, linux-5.10.215 and later 5.10.x
versions fail to start dosemu.
Inside that 32-bit VM, linux-5.10.215 and later 5.10.x
versions work if "mitigations=off" kernel parameter is
added to the kernel running inside the VM.
I have narrowed down the problem so that linux-5.10.214 plus
following 5 patches trigger that failure. Above dmesg output
from "5.10.214-test12345" kernel includes following 5
patches.
x86/asm: Add _ASM_RIP() macro for x86-64 (%rip) suffix
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=8b20c6f894b7d7d87d3aa1a85cbc7d57378e1346
x86/bugs: Add asm helpers for executing VERW
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=35e36eac881cddea42ca5fd93facc145a2d5369d
x86/entry_64: Add VERW just before userspace transition
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=edc702b4a820fc7ffc20e732db1c421cfffbb746
x86/entry_32: Add VERW just before userspace transition
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=50f021f0b985629accf10481a6e89af8b9700583
x86/bugs: Use ALTERNATIVE() instead of mds_user_clear static key
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=6192d9ed311f70eb7e8ab4a874631a98c5a9217e
My reading of above dmesg output indicates that it is that
VERW opcode that fails inside CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS macro in
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h file. My reading of
(possibly outdated) Intel Instruction Set Reference
indicates this: "The VERR and VERW instructions are not
recognized in virtual-8086 mode". My understanding is that
dosemu uses virtual-8086 mode if that is available. Did
above patch-set just kill virtual-8086 mode and dosemu
permanently despite my 32-bit VM kernel .config having
these?
CONFIG_X86_LEGACY_VM86=y
CONFIG_VM86=y
I know that I am doing weird stuff and I understand that
32-bit linux and dosemu are probably something that most
people don't care about, but this is still stable
linux-5.10.x kernel regression that should be fixed.
Upstream Linux-6.10-rc4 seems to have similarly functioning
CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS macro with VERW opcode that is used in
restore_all_switch_stack code path, so the same problem may
well be with all newer kernels.
Pawan Gupta,
Since you seem to be the author of above mentioned breakage,
is there any chance of you sorting this out?
--
Jari Ruusu 4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation
2024-06-23 14:34 Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation Jari Ruusu
@ 2024-06-24 17:09 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-06-25 13:49 ` Jari Ruusu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pawan Gupta @ 2024-06-24 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jari Ruusu; +Cc: Dave Hansen, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 02:34:12PM +0000, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> I have 32-bit x86 linux virtual machine running on
> QEMU-8.2.2+ds-0ubuntu1 with KVM acceleration. QEMU emulated
> CPU model is pentium2. Host is 64-bit linux running on Intel
> i5-7200U with latest microcode. Inside that 32-bit x86 linux
> VM I sometimes start dosemu to run some old MS-DOS programs.
>
> Now dosemu fails to start with "Segmentation fault" error,
> and this shows up in dmesg output:
>
> [ 23.768348] general protection fault: 0000 [#1]
> [ 23.768353] CPU: 0 PID: 1730 Comm: dosemu.bin Not tainted 5.10.214-test12345 #1
> [ 23.768354] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> [ 23.768358] EIP: restore_all_switch_stack+0xbd/0xc5
> [ 23.768359] Code: 10 36 89 48 fc 8b 4c 24 0c 81 e1 ff ff 00 00 36 89 48 f8 8b 4c 24 08 36 89 48 f4 8b 4c 24 04 36 89 48 f0 59 8d 60 f0 58 89 f6 <0f> 00 2d 80 87 5c c1 cf fc 0f a0 50 b8 00 00 00 00 8e e0 8c d0 66
> [ 23.768361] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
> [ 23.768362] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ffc03fdc
> [ 23.768363] DS: 0000 ES: 0000 FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [ 23.768366] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00a33020 CR3: 0fc3b000 CR4: 00000290
> [ 23.768368] Call Trace:
> [ 23.768371] ? show_regs+0x5d/0x60
> [ 23.768373] ? __die_body+0x10/0x43
> [ 23.768374] ? die_addr+0x27/0x3c
> [ 23.768376] ? exc_general_protection+0x1e6/0x239
> [ 23.768378] ? exc_bounds+0x8a/0x8a
> [ 23.768379] ? handle_exception+0x147/0x147
> [ 23.768381] ? exc_bounds+0x8a/0x8a
> [ 23.768386] ? restore_all_switch_stack+0xbd/0xc5
> [ 23.768388] ? exc_bounds+0x8a/0x8a
> [ 23.768389] ? restore_all_switch_stack+0xbd/0xc5
> [ 23.768390] Modules linked in:
> [ 23.768392] ---[ end trace 960c0712f12c2f48 ]---
> [ 23.768394] EIP: restore_all_switch_stack+0xbd/0xc5
> [ 23.768395] Code: 10 36 89 48 fc 8b 4c 24 0c 81 e1 ff ff 00 00 36 89 48 f8 8b 4c 24 08 36 89 48 f4 8b 4c 24 04 36 89 48 f0 59 8d 60 f0 58 89 f6 <0f> 00 2d 80 87 5c c1 cf fc 0f a0 50 b8 00 00 00 00 8e e0 8c d0 66
> [ 23.768396] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
> [ 23.768397] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ffc03fdc
> [ 23.768398] DS: 0000 ES: 0000 FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [ 23.768400] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00a33020 CR3: 0fc3b000 CR4: 00000290
>
> Inside that 32-bit VM, kernel.org linux-5.10.214 and earlier
> 5.10.x versions start dosemu normally.
>
> Inside that 32-bit VM, linux-5.10.215 and later 5.10.x
> versions fail to start dosemu.
>
> Inside that 32-bit VM, linux-5.10.215 and later 5.10.x
> versions work if "mitigations=off" kernel parameter is
> added to the kernel running inside the VM.
>
> I have narrowed down the problem so that linux-5.10.214 plus
> following 5 patches trigger that failure. Above dmesg output
> from "5.10.214-test12345" kernel includes following 5
> patches.
>
>
>
> x86/asm: Add _ASM_RIP() macro for x86-64 (%rip) suffix
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=8b20c6f894b7d7d87d3aa1a85cbc7d57378e1346
>
> x86/bugs: Add asm helpers for executing VERW
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=35e36eac881cddea42ca5fd93facc145a2d5369d
>
> x86/entry_64: Add VERW just before userspace transition
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=edc702b4a820fc7ffc20e732db1c421cfffbb746
>
> x86/entry_32: Add VERW just before userspace transition
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=50f021f0b985629accf10481a6e89af8b9700583
>
> x86/bugs: Use ALTERNATIVE() instead of mds_user_clear static key
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=6192d9ed311f70eb7e8ab4a874631a98c5a9217e
>
>
>
> My reading of above dmesg output indicates that it is that
> VERW opcode that fails inside CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS macro in
> arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h file. My reading of
> (possibly outdated) Intel Instruction Set Reference
> indicates this: "The VERR and VERW instructions are not
> recognized in virtual-8086 mode". My understanding is that
> dosemu uses virtual-8086 mode if that is available. Did
> above patch-set just kill virtual-8086 mode and dosemu
> permanently despite my 32-bit VM kernel .config having
> these?
>
> CONFIG_X86_LEGACY_VM86=y
> CONFIG_VM86=y
>
> I know that I am doing weird stuff and I understand that
> 32-bit linux and dosemu are probably something that most
> people don't care about, but this is still stable
> linux-5.10.x kernel regression that should be fixed.
>
> Upstream Linux-6.10-rc4 seems to have similarly functioning
> CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS macro with VERW opcode that is used in
> restore_all_switch_stack code path, so the same problem may
> well be with all newer kernels.
>
> Pawan Gupta,
> Since you seem to be the author of above mentioned breakage,
> is there any chance of you sorting this out?
Below patch (for v6.10-rc5) should fix this. I didn't send this patch
earlier because I havn't got a chance to make sure if it will work for
other cases like modify_ldt().
---
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/entry_32: Move CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS before restoring
segments
Robert Gill reported below #GP when dosemu software was executing vm86()
system call:
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 4 PID: 4610 Comm: dosemu.bin Not tainted 6.6.21-gentoo-x86 #1
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge 1950/0H723K, BIOS 2.7.0 10/30/2010
EIP: restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ff8affdc
DS: 0000 ES: 0000 FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00c2101c CR3: 04b6d000 CR4: 000406d0
Call Trace:
show_regs+0x70/0x78
die_addr+0x29/0x70
exc_general_protection+0x13c/0x348
exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
handle_exception+0x14d/0x14d
exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
This only happens when VERW based mitigations like MDS, RFDS are enabled.
This is because segment registers can have funky values with vm86() that
can result in #GP when executing VERW. Intel SDM vol. 2C documents the
following behavior for VERW instruction:
#GP(0) - If a memory operand effective address is outside the CS, DS, ES,
FS, or GS segment limit.
CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS macro executes VERW instruction before returning to user
space. Add CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS to the macro RESTORE_REGS before it restores
segment registers. In vm86 mode kernel does not support SYSCALL and
SYSENTER instructions, so the problem is only limited to int80 path in
32-bit mode. Leave the CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS in the opportunistic SYSEXIT path
as it is.
Below are the locations where CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS is currently being done.
* entry_INT80_32(), entry_SYSENTER_32() and interrupts (via
handle_exception_return) do:
restore_all_switch_stack:
[...]
RESTORE_REGS pop=4 clear_cpu_buf=1
pop %ebx
pop %ecx
pop %edx
pop %esi
pop %edi
pop %ebp
pop %eax
verw 0xc0fb0fc0 <-------------
pop %ds
pop %es
pop %fs
* Opportunistic SYSEXIT explicitly does CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS:
[...]
pop %eax
verw 0xc0fb0fc0 <-------------
sti
sysexit
* NMIs use RESTORE_ALL_NMI -> RESTORE_REGS:
nmi_return:
[...]
RESTORE_ALL_NMI cr3_reg=%edi
jmp 0xc0fb22e0 <asm_exc_nmi+612>
test $0x1000,%edi
je 0xc0fb22e0 <asm_exc_nmi+612>
mov %edi,%cr3
pop %ebx
pop %ecx
pop %edx
pop %esi
pop %edi
pop %ebp
pop %eax
verw 0xc0fb0fc0 <-------------
pop %ds
pop %es
pop %fs
Fixes: a0e2dab44d22 ("x86/entry_32: Add VERW just before userspace transition")
Reported-by: Robert Gill <rtgill82@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218707
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c77ccfd-d561-45a1-8ed5-6b75212c7a58@leemhuis.info/
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index d3a814efbff6..c963abc17a96 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -263,8 +263,15 @@
popl %eax
.endm
-.macro RESTORE_REGS pop=0
+.macro RESTORE_REGS pop=0 clear_cpu_buf=0
RESTORE_INT_REGS
+ /*
+ * CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS must be done before restoring segment
+ * registers to avoid #GP when executing VERW in vm86 mode.
+ */
+ .if \clear_cpu_buf
+ CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
+ .endif
1: popl %ds
2: popl %es
3: popl %fs
@@ -299,7 +306,7 @@
BUG_IF_WRONG_CR3
- RESTORE_REGS pop=\pop
+ RESTORE_REGS pop=\pop clear_cpu_buf=1
.endm
.macro CHECK_AND_APPLY_ESPFIX
@@ -950,8 +957,7 @@ restore_all_switch_stack:
BUG_IF_WRONG_CR3
/* Restore user state */
- RESTORE_REGS pop=4 # skip orig_eax/error_code
- CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
+ RESTORE_REGS pop=4 clear_cpu_buf=1 # skip orig_eax/error_code
.Lirq_return:
/*
* ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE rely on IRET core serialization
@@ -1144,7 +1150,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START(asm_exc_nmi)
/* Not on SYSENTER stack. */
call exc_nmi
- CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
jmp .Lnmi_return
.Lnmi_from_sysenter_stack:
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation
2024-06-24 17:09 ` Pawan Gupta
@ 2024-06-25 13:49 ` Jari Ruusu
2024-06-25 18:01 ` Pawan Gupta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jari Ruusu @ 2024-06-25 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pawan Gupta; +Cc: Dave Hansen, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
On Monday, June 24th, 2024 at 20:09, Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Below patch (for v6.10-rc5) should fix this. I didn't send this patch
> earlier because I havn't got a chance to make sure if it will work for
> other cases like modify_ldt().
Thank you for fixing this regression.
I tested your patch on 32-bit linux-5.10.220 inside VM, and now
dosemu seems to work OK.
I do have a related question:
In SYSENTER code path (that is not used by virtual-8086 mode),
there is CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS just before STI and SYSEXIT, but that
CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS happens after flags are restored with POPFL.
VERW opcode inside that CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS modifies ZF flag.
Is that ZF flag damage OK?
--
Jari Ruusu 4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation
2024-06-25 13:49 ` Jari Ruusu
@ 2024-06-25 18:01 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-06-26 13:02 ` Jari Ruusu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pawan Gupta @ 2024-06-25 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jari Ruusu; +Cc: Dave Hansen, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 01:49:17PM +0000, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> On Monday, June 24th, 2024 at 20:09, Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Below patch (for v6.10-rc5) should fix this. I didn't send this patch
> > earlier because I havn't got a chance to make sure if it will work for
> > other cases like modify_ldt().
>
> Thank you for fixing this regression.
>
> I tested your patch on 32-bit linux-5.10.220 inside VM, and now
> dosemu seems to work OK.
>
> I do have a related question:
> In SYSENTER code path (that is not used by virtual-8086 mode),
> there is CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS just before STI and SYSEXIT, but that
> CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS happens after flags are restored with POPFL.
> VERW opcode inside that CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS modifies ZF flag.
Thanks for pointing this out, CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS should happen before POPFL.
Below patch moves it before POPFL and also adds a safer version that
switches to KERNEL_DS before executing VERW. This should ensure VERW works
in all cases:
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index c963abc17a96..2680be38e5cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -253,6 +253,17 @@
.Lend_\@:
.endm
+/* Make sure ds has a safe value so that VERW does not #GP */
+.macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
+ ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lskip_verw\@", "", X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
+ pushl %ds
+ pushl $(__KERNEL_DS)
+ popl %ds
+ verw _ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)
+ popl %ds
+.Lskip_verw\@:
+.endm
+
.macro RESTORE_INT_REGS
popl %ebx
popl %ecx
@@ -878,6 +889,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(entry_SYSENTER_32)
/* Now ready to switch the cr3 */
SWITCH_TO_USER_CR3 scratch_reg=%eax
+ CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
/*
* Restore all flags except IF. (We restore IF separately because
@@ -888,7 +900,6 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(entry_SYSENTER_32)
BUG_IF_WRONG_CR3 no_user_check=1
popfl
popl %eax
- CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
/*
* Return back to the vDSO, which will pop ecx and edx.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation
2024-06-25 18:01 ` Pawan Gupta
@ 2024-06-26 13:02 ` Jari Ruusu
2024-07-01 12:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jari Ruusu @ 2024-06-26 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pawan Gupta; +Cc: Dave Hansen, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
On Tuesday, June 25th, 2024 at 21:01, Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out, CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS should happen before POPFL.
> Below patch moves it before POPFL and also adds a safer version that
> switches to KERNEL_DS before executing VERW. This should ensure VERW works
> in all cases:
Your patch looks OK to me. Thanks.
Tested on linux-5.10.220 inside 32-bit VM.
--
Jari Ruusu 4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation
2024-06-26 13:02 ` Jari Ruusu
@ 2024-07-01 12:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-01 14:55 ` Jari Ruusu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-07-01 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jari Ruusu; +Cc: Pawan Gupta, Dave Hansen, linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 01:02:35PM +0000, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 25th, 2024 at 21:01, Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for pointing this out, CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS should happen before POPFL.
> > Below patch moves it before POPFL and also adds a safer version that
> > switches to KERNEL_DS before executing VERW. This should ensure VERW works
> > in all cases:
>
> Your patch looks OK to me. Thanks.
> Tested on linux-5.10.220 inside 32-bit VM.
Great! Hopefully someone submits this to the stable tree so we can
accept it...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation
2024-07-01 12:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-07-01 14:55 ` Jari Ruusu
2024-07-01 15:42 ` Pawan Gupta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jari Ruusu @ 2024-07-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: Pawan Gupta, Dave Hansen, linux-kernel
On Monday, July 1st, 2024 at 15:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 01:02:35PM +0000, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 25th, 2024 at 21:01, Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > Thanks for pointing this out, CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS should happen before POPFL.
> > > Below patch moves it before POPFL and also adds a safer version that
> > > switches to KERNEL_DS before executing VERW. This should ensure VERW works
> > > in all cases:
> >
> > Your patch looks OK to me. Thanks.
> > Tested on linux-5.10.220 inside 32-bit VM.
>
> Great! Hopefully someone submits this to the stable tree so we can
> accept it...
Upstream is still not fixed. My understanding is that the patch
is on its way to upstream already, but not there yet.
--
Jari Ruusu 4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation
2024-07-01 14:55 ` Jari Ruusu
@ 2024-07-01 15:42 ` Pawan Gupta
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pawan Gupta @ 2024-07-01 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jari Ruusu; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Dave Hansen, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:55:08PM +0000, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> On Monday, July 1st, 2024 at 15:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 01:02:35PM +0000, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, June 25th, 2024 at 21:01, Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > > Thanks for pointing this out, CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS should happen before POPFL.
> > > > Below patch moves it before POPFL and also adds a safer version that
> > > > switches to KERNEL_DS before executing VERW. This should ensure VERW works
> > > > in all cases:
> > >
> > > Your patch looks OK to me. Thanks.
> > > Tested on linux-5.10.220 inside 32-bit VM.
> >
> > Great! Hopefully someone submits this to the stable tree so we can
> > accept it...
>
> Upstream is still not fixed. My understanding is that the patch
> is on its way to upstream already, but not there yet.
Yes, its being discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240627-fix-dosemu-vm86-v2-1-d5579f698e77@linux.intel.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-01 15:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-23 14:34 Stable linux-5.10.x regression triggered by MDS mitigation Jari Ruusu
2024-06-24 17:09 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-06-25 13:49 ` Jari Ruusu
2024-06-25 18:01 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-06-26 13:02 ` Jari Ruusu
2024-07-01 12:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-01 14:55 ` Jari Ruusu
2024-07-01 15:42 ` Pawan Gupta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®